From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/17] store length of commit->buffer Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 17:46:16 -0400 Message-ID: <20140610214616.GA19107@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20140609180236.GA24644@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20140610213509.GA26979@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Junio C Hamano , Christian Couder , Jakub Narebski , Eric Sunshine To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jun 10 23:46:25 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WuTs6-0001VI-Cn for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:46:22 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753828AbaFJVqS (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jun 2014 17:46:18 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:41456 "HELO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753136AbaFJVqR (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jun 2014 17:46:17 -0400 Received: (qmail 20212 invoked by uid 102); 10 Jun 2014 21:46:17 -0000 Received: from c-71-63-4-13.hsd1.va.comcast.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (71.63.4.13) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 16:46:17 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 10 Jun 2014 17:46:16 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140610213509.GA26979@sigill.intra.peff.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 05:35:09PM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > Here's a re-roll of the commit-slab series. It fixes the issues pointed > out by Eric and Christian (thanks, both). Side note: I marked this as v2, but forgot to do so in each individual patch (I write my cover letters first, and then issue format-patch as a separate step, and I sometimes forget -v2 there). How big an inconvenience is this? When I was acting maintainer, it didn't bother me, as I picked the patches up via threading. But if it is annoying, I can try to teach my scripts to do it automatically, so I stop forgetting. -Peff