From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 0/4] verify-commit: verify commit signatures Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 20:48:14 -0400 Message-ID: <20140628004814.GC13228@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Michael J Gruber , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jun 28 02:48:20 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1X0goV-0000uO-TC for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 02:48:20 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753454AbaF1AsQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2014 20:48:16 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:52388 "HELO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750831AbaF1AsQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2014 20:48:16 -0400 Received: (qmail 24185 invoked by uid 102); 28 Jun 2014 00:48:16 -0000 Received: from c-71-63-4-13.hsd1.va.comcast.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (71.63.4.13) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 19:48:16 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 27 Jun 2014 20:48:14 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:07:35PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > - Should we do this now or go for generic "git verify" right away? > > I do not think we are ready to do "git verify" yet. If there is one thing that this discussion have convinced me of, it is this. :) -Peff