From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH] remote-curl: do not complain on EOF from parent git Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 17:42:17 -0400 Message-ID: <20140709214217.GD25854@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <787461404891471@web12h.yandex.ru> <20140709205902.GB25854@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20140709212043.GC25854@sigill.intra.peff.net> <1404941118.23510.34.camel@jekeller-desk1.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: "git@vger.kernel.org" , "wipedout@yandex.ru" To: "Keller, Jacob E" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jul 09 23:42:24 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1X4zd9-0006hG-AL for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Jul 2014 23:42:23 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754252AbaGIVmT (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jul 2014 17:42:19 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:58985 "HELO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750889AbaGIVmT (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jul 2014 17:42:19 -0400 Received: (qmail 10268 invoked by uid 102); 9 Jul 2014 21:42:19 -0000 Received: from c-71-63-4-13.hsd1.va.comcast.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (71.63.4.13) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Wed, 09 Jul 2014 16:42:19 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 09 Jul 2014 17:42:17 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1404941118.23510.34.camel@jekeller-desk1.amr.corp.intel.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 09:25:18PM +0000, Keller, Jacob E wrote: > On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 17:20 -0400, Jeff King wrote: > > The parent git process is supposed to send us an empty line > > to indicate that the conversation is over. However, the > > parent process may die() if there is a problem with the > > operaiton (e.g., we try to fetch a ref that does not exist). > > Nitpick, but you probably meant operation here. I did (and I probably meant to turn on spellcheck, too...). I'll repost in a minute, as I have some follow-on patches. Thanks. -Peff