From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: State coding guideline for error message punctuation
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 16:42:28 -0400
Message-ID: <20140710204228.GA4459@sigill.intra.peff.net>
References: <1402923357-3788-1-git-send-email-philipoakley@iee.org>
 <1402923357-3788-2-git-send-email-philipoakley@iee.org>
 <20140617093759.GA6267@sigill.intra.peff.net>
 <xmqqwqbl6jey.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Cc: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.org>, GitList <git@vger.kernel.org>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jul 10 22:42:37 2014
Return-path: <git-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67])
	by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <git-owner@vger.kernel.org>)
	id 1X5LAo-0002Eg-BP
	for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 22:42:34 +0200
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752216AbaGJUmb (ORCPT <rfc822;gcvg-git-2@m.gmane.org>);
	Thu, 10 Jul 2014 16:42:31 -0400
Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:59589 "HELO peff.net"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id S1751839AbaGJUma (ORCPT <rfc822;git@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 10 Jul 2014 16:42:30 -0400
Received: (qmail 12938 invoked by uid 102); 10 Jul 2014 20:42:30 -0000
Received: from c-71-63-4-13.hsd1.va.comcast.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (71.63.4.13)
  (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5)
  by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 15:42:30 -0500
Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 10 Jul 2014 16:42:28 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <xmqqwqbl6jey.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <git.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/253212>

On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 01:36:05PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> > Perhaps there are others (we do not have to be exhaustive, but it makes
> > sense to think for a moment while we are here).
> 
> I do not want to forever be waiting for a reroll, so let's queue
> this and advance it to 'next' soonish, and refine the guidelines by
> further building on top of it as needed.

Yes, that looks good to me. Thanks for moving this forward.

-Peff