From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: git diff-tree commit detail bug in 2.0.2 and 2.0.3 Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 03:54:54 -0400 Message-ID: <20140729075454.GA4114@peff.net> References: <20140728103504.GB10737@peff.net> <20140728173734.GA10309@peff.net> <20140728180157.GA11265@peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Junio C Hamano , Git Users To: Bryan Turner X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jul 29 09:55:02 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XC2FQ-0006EO-JB for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 09:55:00 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752074AbaG2Hy5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2014 03:54:57 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:42293 "HELO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751038AbaG2Hy4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2014 03:54:56 -0400 Received: (qmail 1433 invoked by uid 102); 29 Jul 2014 07:54:56 -0000 Received: from c-71-63-4-13.hsd1.va.comcast.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (71.63.4.13) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 02:54:56 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 29 Jul 2014 03:54:54 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:06:25AM +1000, Bryan Turner wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > OK, I pushed out updated 'maint' and 'master'. The former merges > > a rebased version of jk/alloc-commit-id in to make the "reorganize > > the way we manage the in-core commit data" topic, and the latter > > reverts the "Use SSE to micro-optimize a leaf function to check the > > format of a ref string". > > > > Please give them some quick sanity check. They both look OK to me. > Thanks both of you; I appreciate your efforts! I've run my suite of > tests against the tips of master and maint and all 681 pass for each. > Looks good to me. So what suite of tests is this? Is it worth getting you to fold it into our regular test suite? :) -Peff