git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: "René Scharfe" <l.s.r@web.de>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
	Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] walker: avoid quadratic list insertion in mark_complete
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 00:01:31 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140822040131.GA27992@peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53F63AC0.1090605@web.de>

On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 08:30:24PM +0200, René Scharfe wrote:

> Similar to 16445242 (fetch-pack: avoid quadratic list insertion in
> mark_complete), sort only after all refs are collected instead of while
> inserting.  The result is the same, but it's more efficient that way.
> The difference will only be measurable in repositories with a large
> number of refs.

Thanks, this looks obviously correct.

I wonder if we should do this on top:

diff --git a/walker.c b/walker.c
index 0148264..70088b8 100644
--- a/walker.c
+++ b/walker.c
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static int interpret_target(struct walker *walker, char *target, unsigned char *
 static int mark_complete(const char *path, const unsigned char *sha1, int flag, void *cb_data)
 {
 	struct commit *commit = lookup_commit_reference_gently(sha1, 1);
-	if (commit) {
+	if (commit && !(commit->object.flags & COMPLETE)) {
 		commit->object.flags |= COMPLETE;
 		commit_list_insert_by_date(commit, &complete);
 	}

It's not as big a deal with your patch since you've made it O(n log n),
but reducing n further does not hurt.

-Peff

      reply	other threads:[~2014-08-22  4:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-21 18:30 [PATCH] walker: avoid quadratic list insertion in mark_complete René Scharfe
2014-08-22  4:01 ` Jeff King [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140822040131.GA27992@peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=l.s.r@web.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).