From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Aug 2014, #04; Tue, 26) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 04:13:23 -0400 Message-ID: <20140827081323.GA26538@peff.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Aug 27 10:13:52 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XMYMY-0005IN-Te for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 10:13:51 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932361AbaH0IN3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2014 04:13:29 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:59934 "HELO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1755335AbaH0INZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2014 04:13:25 -0400 Received: (qmail 16379 invoked by uid 102); 27 Aug 2014 08:13:25 -0000 Received: from c-71-63-4-13.hsd1.va.comcast.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (71.63.4.13) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 03:13:25 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 27 Aug 2014 04:13:23 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 03:09:34PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > [New Topics] There are a few misc topics of mine that I'd like to ping on: - jk/contrib-subtree-make-all; you picked up the topic, but it's not in pu or "what's cooking". Just forgotten, I think? - jk/send-pack-many-refspecs; this is in pu, but I didn't see it in "what's cooking". I'm concerned that the "ulimit" test gave you trouble and you punted on it. :) - "fast-export --anonymize"; I noticed you didn't pick this up at all. I agree it has yet to prove its worth, but I wonder if it is worth shipping it (possibly labeled as experimental and not to be depended on) to get it in the hands of users. The intended use is getting bug reports from users, who are not always savvy enough to pick up (and possibly rebase) a patch from the list. I dunno. -Peff