From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Aug 2014, #04; Tue, 26) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 12:28:19 -0400 Message-ID: <20140827162819.GB1432@peff.net> References: <20140827081323.GA26538@peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Aug 27 18:28:28 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XMg5D-00070e-IU for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 18:28:27 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935103AbaH0Q2W (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2014 12:28:22 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:60153 "HELO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S933798AbaH0Q2V (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2014 12:28:21 -0400 Received: (qmail 8345 invoked by uid 102); 27 Aug 2014 16:28:21 -0000 Received: from c-71-63-4-13.hsd1.va.comcast.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (71.63.4.13) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 11:28:21 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 27 Aug 2014 12:28:19 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 08:31:51AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > - jk/send-pack-many-refspecs; this is in pu, but I didn't see it in > > "what's cooking". I'm concerned that the "ulimit" test gave you > > trouble and you punted on it. :) > > It was picked up after the day's edition of "What's cooking" was > written, or something, I think. Ah, sorry to nag, then. > > - "fast-export --anonymize"; I noticed you didn't pick this up at all. > > I agree it has yet to prove its worth, but I wonder if it is worth > > shipping it (possibly labeled as experimental and not to be depended > > on) to get it in the hands of users. The intended use is getting bug > > reports from users, who are not always savvy enough to pick up (and > > possibly rebase) a patch from the list. I dunno. > > I was waiting for the topic to calm down a bit, without knowing if > there will or will not be a reroll with some low-hanging fruit > enhancement based on the discussion, to avoid an "oops, need to > replace the one I queued but haven't pushed out yet with the new > reroll". Makes sense. I think the v2 I sent[1] is OK, and as far as I was planning to take it for now (there were some other possible enhancements discussed, but I think those can happen in-tree if somebody feels like working on it). -Peff [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/255646