git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Max Kirillov <max@max630.net>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] reachable.c: add HEAD to reachability starting commits
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 11:28:06 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140831152806.GC17449@peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1409432315-20803-1-git-send-email-max@max630.net>

On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 11:58:35PM +0300, Max Kirillov wrote:

> HEAD is not explicitly used as a starting commit for
> calculating reachability, so if it's detached and reflogs
> are disabled it may be pruned.

Eek, you're right. I think nobody noticed because the HEAD reflog
usually picks it up (and you do not usually detach HEAD on a bare repo).
But I agree we should include it to cover this case.

> diff --git a/reachable.c b/reachable.c
> index 654a8c5..6f6835b 100644
> --- a/reachable.c
> +++ b/reachable.c
> @@ -229,6 +229,9 @@ void mark_reachable_objects(struct rev_info *revs, int mark_reflog,
>  	/* Add all external refs */
>  	for_each_ref(add_one_ref, revs);
>  
> +	/* detached HEAD is not included in the list above */
> +	head_ref(add_one_ref, revs);
> +
>  	/* Add all reflog info */
>  	if (mark_reflog)
>  		for_each_reflog(add_one_reflog, revs);

Looks obviously correct.

> diff --git a/t/t5312-prune-detached.sh b/t/t5312-prune-detached.sh
> new file mode 100755
> index 0000000..fac93e1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/t/t5312-prune-detached.sh
> @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> +#!/bin/sh
> +
> +test_description='no prune detached head without reflog'
> +. ./test-lib.sh
> +
> +test_expect_success 'make repo' '
> +	git config core.logAllRefUpdates false
> +	git commit --allow-empty -m commit1 &&
> +	git commit --allow-empty -m commit2 &&
> +	git checkout  --detach master &&
> +	git commit --allow-empty -m commit3
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success 'prune does not delete anything' '
> +	git prune -n >prune_actual &&
> +	: >prune_expected &&
> +	test_cmp prune_expected prune_actual'
> +
> +test_done

Your test looks reasonable, but is there any reason it cannot go in
t5304 with the other prune tests?

-Peff

  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-31 15:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-30 20:58 [PATCH] reachable.c: add HEAD to reachability starting commits Max Kirillov
2014-08-31 15:28 ` Jeff King [this message]
2014-08-31 21:16   ` [PATCH v2] " Max Kirillov
2014-09-02 17:47     ` Junio C Hamano
2014-09-03 16:14       ` [PATCH v3] " Max Kirillov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140831152806.GC17449@peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=max@max630.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).