From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Harry Jeffery <harry@exec64.co.uk>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pretty-format: add append line-feed format specifier
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 18:31:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140909223158.GD14029@peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <540F7C70.4010909@exec64.co.uk>
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 11:17:20PM +0100, Harry Jeffery wrote:
> I definitely prefer your more general solution to my
> bare-minimum-to-scratch-itch patch. I'd certainly be willing to take your
> patch and expand upon it (pun unintended) once Junio has weighed in on your
> suggestions.
Thanks. I am always happy to see contributors willing to pick up and run
with ideas.
It is probably out-of-scope for what you want, but while we are talking
about %d, it may be worth considering whether there is something simple
we can do to make formatting list-like items more flexible. E.g., even
with "%D", you are stuck with the format "foo, bar, baz" for multiple
decorations. Some kind of "%join(%d,; )" might work to produce "foo;
bar; baz" (or whatever you want). But that may also be crossing the line
into insanity, and we would be better to allow some Turing-complete
embedded language like lua. For that matter, conditionals might be
crossing that insanity line, too.
> Regardless of what happens with the conditional expansion I think it would
> definitely be a useful addition to be able to print the decorators without
> the " (...)" wrapper. I think it's general enough that it'd warrant its own
> separate patch rather than being part of a patch series for the conditional
> expansion.
Yeah, I agree it can be separate.
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-09 22:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-09 18:09 [PATCH] pretty-format: add append line-feed format specifier Harry Jeffery
2014-09-09 19:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-09-09 19:30 ` Harry Jeffery
2014-09-09 19:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-09-09 21:45 ` Jeff King
2014-09-09 22:17 ` Harry Jeffery
2014-09-09 22:31 ` Jeff King [this message]
2014-09-10 17:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-09-12 4:49 ` Jeff King
2014-09-12 16:36 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140909223158.GD14029@peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=harry@exec64.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).