From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/16] object_array: factor out slopbuf-freeing logic
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 03:36:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141008073658.GC25250@peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5433CDC2.6000908@alum.mit.edu>
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 01:25:54PM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> > +static void object_array_release_entry(struct object_array_entry *ent)
> > +{
> > + if (ent->name != object_array_slopbuf)
> > + free(ent->name);
> > +}
> > +
>
> Would it be a little safer to set ent->name to NULL or to
> object_array_slopbuf after freeing the memory, to prevent accidents?
I considered that, but what about the other parts of object_array_entry?
Should we NULL the object context pointers, too?
The intent of this function is freeing memory, not clearing it for sane
reuse. I think I'd be more in favor of a comment clarifying that. It is
a static function used only internally by the object-array code.
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-08 7:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-03 20:20 [PATCH 0/16] make prune mtime-checking more careful Jeff King
2014-10-03 20:21 ` [PATCH 01/16] foreach_alt_odb: propagate return value from callback Jeff King
2014-10-03 22:55 ` René Scharfe
2014-10-04 0:31 ` Jeff King
2014-10-03 20:22 ` [PATCH 02/16] isxdigit: cast input to unsigned char Jeff King
2014-10-03 20:22 ` [PATCH 03/16] object_array: factor out slopbuf-freeing logic Jeff King
2014-10-07 11:25 ` Michael Haggerty
2014-10-08 7:36 ` Jeff King [this message]
2014-10-08 8:40 ` Michael Haggerty
2014-10-08 8:55 ` Jeff King
2014-10-03 20:22 ` [PATCH 04/16] object_array: add a "clear" function Jeff King
2014-10-03 20:23 ` [PATCH 05/16] clean up name allocation in prepare_revision_walk Jeff King
2014-10-03 20:24 ` [PATCH 06/16] reachable: clear pending array after walking it Jeff King
2014-10-03 20:25 ` [PATCH 07/16] t5304: use test_path_is_* instead of "test -f" Jeff King
2014-10-03 22:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-10-03 20:27 ` [PATCH 08/16] t5304: use helper to report failure of "test foo = bar" Jeff King
2014-10-03 22:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-10-04 0:13 ` Jeff King
2014-10-07 13:21 ` Michael Haggerty
2014-10-07 17:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-10-07 20:18 ` Jeff King
2014-10-07 20:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-10-07 21:29 ` Jeff King
2014-10-07 21:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-10-07 22:17 ` Michael Haggerty
2014-10-08 1:13 ` Jeff King
2014-10-08 16:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-10-07 21:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-10-03 20:29 ` [PATCH 09/16] prune: factor out loose-object directory traversal Jeff King
2014-10-03 22:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-10-04 0:24 ` Jeff King
2014-10-07 14:07 ` Michael Haggerty
2014-10-08 7:33 ` Jeff King
2014-10-03 20:31 ` [PATCH 10/16] count-objects: do not use xsize_t when counting object size Jeff King
2014-10-03 20:31 ` [PATCH 11/16] count-objects: use for_each_loose_file_in_objdir Jeff King
2014-10-03 20:32 ` [PATCH 12/16] sha1_file: add for_each iterators for loose and packed objects Jeff King
2014-10-05 8:15 ` René Scharfe
2014-10-05 10:47 ` Ramsay Jones
2014-10-03 20:39 ` [PATCH 13/16] prune: keep objects reachable from recent objects Jeff King
2014-10-03 21:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-10-04 0:09 ` Jeff King
2014-10-04 0:30 ` Jeff King
2014-10-04 3:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-10-07 16:29 ` Michael Haggerty
2014-10-08 7:19 ` Jeff King
2014-10-08 10:37 ` Michael Haggerty
2014-10-03 20:39 ` [PATCH 14/16] pack-objects: refactor unpack-unreachable expiration check Jeff King
2014-10-03 20:40 ` [PATCH 15/16] pack-objects: match prune logic for discarding objects Jeff King
2014-10-03 20:41 ` [PATCH 16/16] write_sha1_file: freshen existing objects Jeff King
2014-10-03 21:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-10-04 0:01 ` Jeff King
2014-10-05 9:12 ` René Scharfe
2014-10-03 22:20 ` [PATCH 0/16] make prune mtime-checking more careful Junio C Hamano
2014-10-04 22:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-10-05 9:19 ` René Scharfe
2014-10-06 1:42 ` Jeff King
2014-10-08 8:31 ` Jeff King
2014-10-08 17:03 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141008073658.GC25250@peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhagger@alum.mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).