From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: Test failure Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2014 20:43:54 -0500 Message-ID: <20141109014354.GA23883@peff.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Michael Blume X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Nov 09 02:44:06 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XnHXv-0003MY-RV for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Nov 2014 02:44:04 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751373AbaKIBn7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Nov 2014 20:43:59 -0500 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:38107 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750957AbaKIBn6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Nov 2014 20:43:58 -0500 Received: (qmail 7345 invoked by uid 102); 9 Nov 2014 01:43:58 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.1) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Sat, 08 Nov 2014 19:43:58 -0600 Received: (qmail 13281 invoked by uid 107); 9 Nov 2014 01:44:05 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Sat, 08 Nov 2014 20:44:05 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 08 Nov 2014 20:43:54 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 11:28:32AM -0800, Michael Blume wrote: > When I build and run tests I get > > [11:17][michael.blume@tcc-michael-4:~/workspace/git/t(master)]$ > ./t1410-reflog.sh What does "./t1410-reflog.sh -v -i" report? > A quick search seems to indicate the test is pretty new? > http://www.mail-archive.com/git@vger.kernel.org/msg60495.html Yes, it is new. In these cases there's often some silly little platform incompatibility in the test script, but I don't see one. So maybe the incompatibility is in the code itself; I'm wondering if OS X returns something besides EISDIR when trying to open a directory. Unfortunately I don't have an OS X install handy to test on. -Peff