From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luis Henriques Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] send-email: add --[no-]xmailer option Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 19:44:55 +0000 Message-ID: <20141204194455.GB3386@charon.olymp> References: <20140324213814.GA1267@achilles.my.domain> <20141202193243.GA2999@charon.olymp> <20141203023419.GA10519@dcvr.yhbt.net> <20141204192245.GA3386@charon.olymp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Eric Wong , git@vger.kernel.org, "Kyle J. McKay" To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Dec 04 20:45:10 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XwcKs-0008Ka-4R for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 20:45:10 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933049AbaLDTpD convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Dec 2014 14:45:03 -0500 Received: from haggis.mythic-beasts.com ([93.93.131.56]:52689 "EHLO haggis.mythic-beasts.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933006AbaLDTpB (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Dec 2014 14:45:01 -0500 Received: from [2.81.129.121] (port=54825 helo=localhost) by haggis.mythic-beasts.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XwcKf-0000fk-Ov; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 19:44:58 +0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: -28 X-Mythic-Debug: Threshold = On = X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 11:33:24AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Luis Henriques writes: >=20 > > On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 08:56:45AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > >> I actually do not think this is a good idea from debuggability. > > > > Do you think this could be merged with yet another switch? I can't > > think of a name for the switch, something like... "--hide-msgid"? >=20 > In case it wasn't clear, by "this" I meant the removal of > "X-Mailer:", iow, "Adding --no-xmailer option is a bad idea from > debuggability's point of view". > Oh, ok. I thought you were talking about the message-id. > Not adding message-id is not an option; MSAs are supposed to always > add one if they want to be RFC compliant, aren't they? Yes, of course -- having a message ID is a requirement. But I was hoping you could accept a solution similar to the one suggested by Kyle (adding him to Cc): he was suggesting hashing the message ID, which would be a good compromise, I believe. Cheers, --=20 Lu=EDs