From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Hesse Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] skip RFC1991 tests with gnupg 2.1.x Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 09:35:43 +0100 Message-ID: <20141212093543.5175e7a5@leda.localdomain> References: <1418290234-21516-1-git-send-email-mail@eworm.de> <5489B90B.6070706@web.de> <5489CC60.7080704@drmicha.warpmail.net> <20141211234405.3513d5d7@leda.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/DartVS_zHtduTNxVKeFwm4O"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: Michael J Gruber , Torsten =?UTF-8?B?QsO2?= =?UTF-8?B?Z2Vyc2hhdXNlbg==?= , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Dec 12 09:36:14 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XzLhi-0006mP-Lm for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 09:36:04 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933216AbaLLIf4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2014 03:35:56 -0500 Received: from mx.mylinuxtime.de ([148.251.109.235]:33135 "EHLO mx.mylinuxtime.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751428AbaLLIfz (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2014 03:35:55 -0500 Received: from leda.localdomain (unknown [10.10.1.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.mylinuxtime.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B0BA8241AD; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 09:35:52 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 mx.mylinuxtime.de B0BA8241AD DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eworm.de; s=mail; t=1418373352; bh=XCJSHhAGlnxFOuEEh8WautwEjviPvTTRaX3eMMif7FY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=mSDdrGbCRq5G2aR8l6geQwpStOHKeXhGp74UGlUfcpnvtWDugU6S1hfr9fTHw7hja XFZSBDBfK+AjTsYGhxXwlJDZmPr4/qrG+5n+aoOwk66Ro5So5j1LT/SII09D8t7PAq my/Sr86Nkv2vGZ/hTshwRqaPQmyODQnrLsBMd5/c= In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: %O:rCSkHSKf7^4uF|FD$9$I0}g$nbnS1{DYPvs#:,~e`).mzj\$P9]V!WCveE/XdbL,L!{)6v%x4\Bt!b#{;dS&h"7l=ow'^({02!2%XOugod|u*mYBVm-OS:VpZ"ZrRA4[Q&zye,^j;ftj!Hxx\1@;LM)Pz)|B%1#sfF;s;,N?*K*^) Face: 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 /RkdHu48xT5YqP70DaMOhBcTHmAVDxLaBdle93oJy1QKFUh2GXT4am+YH/GGel1CeI98GdMXsytjCKIq/9cMrlgxFCROv+3/BU1fijNpcVD6DxE8VfLBaxUGr1D5usgDYdjwiPAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: --Sig_/DartVS_zHtduTNxVKeFwm4O Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Junio C Hamano on Thu, 2014/12/11 15:10: > Christian Hesse writes: >=20 > > However... Even if GnuPG 2.2.x (or whatever future release) will become > > next stable: It will not reintroduce support for rfc1991. >=20 > How certain are we about the deprecation? The sixth beta of GnuPG [0] had this change: * gpg: Removed the option --pgp2 and --rfc1991 and the ability to create PGP-2 compatible messages. > It also would make us feel safer if we did not have to depend on the > version or keyfile format (which would not have anything to do with > the decision to support or not to support rfc1991 format) to check > if the feature is supported, but that is a separate issue. Changed in next version. [0] http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-announce/2014q3/000354.html --=20 Best regards, Chris --Sig_/DartVS_zHtduTNxVKeFwm4O Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJUiqjfAAoJEFTtyRYJvJGD9d0QAIuztSbJEqP7OL9sDqSlzCYT B5sH4MXueE1M3RWYSlNQ1/uw5Lk3Mz4F24D83x9sRF2SfyUkEnysjeEu/ISQd385 pVAFJmPVO44uSyndOjPGgZy6k65gigeYwEQqPIAs2O6FyVDvKeMBdb1h7XbVIU2m lO6Vg1papiCx05kB9zympkI6BSVFY73clfelP++CAGBUQkbtsofCy7AA+2KJH9Sh +sjAhhX3X4hKvGIqgb4b+dwuPQXydQtZxtG6hUPdvPGiwfSUTNpFKxQ7F1s+oatb uVxmGXVkB3vFJMqCDyYvlR2rNw2QX3Rmla2xnPU9PZIH6WpoBm+SNXZQSNdC/cHU JLVIEw0zKukRuW2nV12ToIksUOQW+Hu8uNWeC3eihGolaCAHHo64Fxmxsb6RpJGO tAw45oae/lfHEstWNxWUp0y+AIQNKfIZ71r1is19a2fkopsODETsuurbCYwDZ7oj 5BZdoVc+n4Dm29SQM1pbOclFR/fstTrh2V74DQeWX+i1+FB28zjvemUcu5bbmHJL vC3USim/NCFWigsboREvKtcAh6ixgNXV5fMnluNXp4alZUqSh34PgcSFaPXEiy/4 ZZQWdiw+RMj7x32DpYy9XWMA3JreQNnyDUaR2U1dewIFS/2v2tB6ogJTkV5iO/XY NAhXcprpYstqIHd7DTqg =xy/B -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/DartVS_zHtduTNxVKeFwm4O--