From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
To: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Cc: pclouds@gmail.com, gitster@pobox.com, git@vger.kernel.org,
sunshine@sunshineco.com, mhagger@alum.mit.edu,
ronniesahlberg@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv10 01/10] receive-pack.c: shorten the execute_commands loop over all commands
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 12:22:44 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150105202244.GL29365@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1420482355-24995-1-git-send-email-sbeller@google.com>
Stefan Beller wrote:
> --- a/builtin/receive-pack.c
> +++ b/builtin/receive-pack.c
[...]
> @@ -1077,27 +1100,15 @@ static void execute_commands(struct command *commands,
[...]
> + if (shallow_update)
> + assure_connectivity_checked(commands, si);
Looking at this code alone, it seems like assure_connectivity_checked()
is going to ensure that connectivity was checked, so that I can assume
connectivity going forward. But the opposite is true --- it is a
safety check that prints a warning and doesn't affect what I can
assume.
The factored-out function fails in what it is meant to do, which is to
save the reader of execute_commands from having to look at the
implementation of the parts they are not interested in.
Would something like warn_if_skipped_connectivity_check() make sense?
Jonathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-05 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-30 23:41 [PATCH 0/9] atomic pushes Stefan Beller
2014-12-30 23:41 ` [PATCHv9 1/9] receive-pack.c: shorten the execute_commands loop over all commands Stefan Beller
2015-01-03 2:20 ` Jonathan Nieder
2015-01-03 9:53 ` Duy Nguyen
2015-01-05 18:02 ` Stefan Beller
2015-01-05 18:25 ` [PATCHv10 01/10] " Stefan Beller
2015-01-05 18:25 ` [PATCHv10 02/10] receive-pack.c: die instead of error in assure_connectivity_checked Stefan Beller
2015-01-05 20:17 ` Jonathan Nieder
2015-01-05 21:15 ` Stefan Beller
2015-01-05 21:25 ` Jonathan Nieder
2015-01-06 19:40 ` [PATCHv11 02/11] receive-pack.c: die instead of error in case of possible future bug Stefan Beller
2015-01-06 19:46 ` Jonathan Nieder
2015-01-05 20:22 ` Jonathan Nieder [this message]
2015-01-05 21:07 ` [PATCHv10 01/10] receive-pack.c: shorten the execute_commands loop over all commands Stefan Beller
2015-01-05 21:18 ` Jonathan Nieder
2015-01-06 19:34 ` [PATCHv11 01/11] " Stefan Beller
2014-12-30 23:41 ` [PATCHv9 2/9] receive-pack.c: move iterating over all commands outside execute_commands Stefan Beller
2014-12-30 23:41 ` [PATCHv9 3/9] receive-pack.c: move transaction handling in a central place Stefan Beller
2014-12-30 23:41 ` [PATCHv9 4/9] receive-pack.c: add execute_commands_atomic function Stefan Beller
2014-12-30 23:41 ` [PATCHv9 5/9] receive-pack.c: negotiate atomic push support Stefan Beller
2014-12-30 23:41 ` [PATCHv9 6/9] send-pack: rename ref_update_to_be_sent to check_to_send_update Stefan Beller
2014-12-30 23:41 ` [PATCHv9 7/9] send-pack.c: add --atomic command line argument Stefan Beller
2014-12-30 23:41 ` [PATCHv9 8/9] push.c: add an --atomic argument Stefan Beller
2014-12-30 23:41 ` [PATCHv9 9/9] t5543-atomic-push.sh: add basic tests for atomic pushes Stefan Beller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150105202244.GL29365@google.com \
--to=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=mhagger@alum.mit.edu \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=ronniesahlberg@gmail.com \
--cc=sbeller@google.com \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).