git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Paul Sokolovsky <paul.sokolovsky@linaro.org>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] update-server-info: create info/* with mode 0666
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 14:39:51 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150106193950.GB28440@peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqh9w3px0a.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>

On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 10:47:01AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> 
> > +test_expect_success POSIXPERM 'info/refs is readable in unshared repo' '
> > +	rm -f .git/info/refs &&
> > +	test_unconfig core.sharedrepository &&
> > +	umask 002 &&
> > +	git update-server-info &&
> > +	echo "-rw-rw-r--" >expect &&
> > +	modebits .git/info/refs >actual &&
> > +	test_cmp expect actual
> > +'
> 
> Hmm, the label and the test look somewhat out-of-sync.  "readable as
> long as umask allows it" would be more in line with what the fix is
> about (i.e. I would expect a test with that title to pass even if I
> changed 'umask 002' to 'umask 007', but that is not what we want in
> this series).

That is definitely not what the series means to accomplish. I think
naming the test "info/refs respects umask in unshared repo" is probably
a better title for the test.

-Peff

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-06 19:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-05 19:07 git 2.2.x: Unexpected, overstrict file permissions after "git update-server-info" Paul Sokolovsky
2015-01-05 22:23 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2015-01-06  3:47 ` Jeff King
2015-01-06  3:49   ` [PATCH 1/2] t1301: set umask in reflog sharedrepository=group test Jeff King
2015-01-06  3:50   ` [PATCH 2/2] update-server-info: create info/* with mode 0666 Jeff King
2015-01-06 18:47     ` Junio C Hamano
2015-01-06 19:39       ` Jeff King [this message]
2015-01-06 21:43         ` Junio C Hamano
2015-01-06 21:47           ` Jeff King
2015-01-06 10:08   ` git 2.2.x: Unexpected, overstrict file permissions after "git update-server-info" Junio C Hamano
2015-01-06 12:43     ` Paul Sokolovsky
2015-01-06 18:44     ` Junio C Hamano
2015-01-06 19:37     ` Jeff King
2015-01-06 12:12   ` Paul Sokolovsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150106193950.GB28440@peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=paul.sokolovsky@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).