From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Keeping Subject: Re: RFC: update hook for GPG signed submission on secured branches Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 19:59:50 +0000 Message-ID: <20150116195950.GK26383@serenity.lan> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: 'Junio C Hamano' , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jason Pyeron X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jan 16 21:05:57 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YCD9V-00040q-7p for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 21:05:53 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754232AbbAPUFt (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2015 15:05:49 -0500 Received: from jackal.aluminati.org ([72.9.247.210]:59712 "EHLO jackal.aluminati.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753944AbbAPUFs (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2015 15:05:48 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 347 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 15:05:48 EST Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jackal.aluminati.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F38CDA59A; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 20:00:00 +0000 (GMT) X-Quarantine-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at serval.aluminati.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 tagged_above=-9999 required=6.31 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_50=0.8] autolearn=no Received: from jackal.aluminati.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (jackal.aluminati.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id yYWEeSjZE+jU; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 19:59:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from serenity.lan (banza.aluminati.org [10.0.7.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by jackal.aluminati.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6D2AFCDA5B3; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 19:59:51 +0000 (GMT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 02:47:25PM -0500, Jason Pyeron wrote: > > I am not sure if the design of this, to require signature only on > > the tip commit, is sound. That is not a -bug- in the script, > > though. > > It is to handle the "all my devs worked on this, they do ________ > GPG", so as long as the tip os signed, it is an implicit I am > responsible for what is submitted. Isn't this an ideal scenario for using the signed pushes introduced in Git 2.2.0?