From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] commit: reword --author error message Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:45:54 -0500 Message-ID: <20150127024553.GA24569@peff.net> References: <7e2e1d1e7f4a25d84a6f7a1c0cb035221529f189.1422286879.git.git@drmicha.warpmail.net> <20150126190711.GA13582@peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Michael J Gruber , git@vger.kernel.org, Eric Sunshine , Philip Oakley , Gunnar Wagner To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jan 27 03:46:01 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YFwAC-0002YZ-Bg for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 03:46:00 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757184AbbA0Cp5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:45:57 -0500 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:38872 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752194AbbA0Cpz (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:45:55 -0500 Received: (qmail 6946 invoked by uid 102); 27 Jan 2015 02:45:55 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.1) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:45:55 -0600 Received: (qmail 8672 invoked by uid 107); 27 Jan 2015 02:46:22 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:46:22 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:45:54 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 06:43:46PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff King writes: > > > ... I somehow had trouble making > > sense of Z ("a match...") as a noun. > > > I wonder if adding back in the missing verb, rather than a colon, would > > also make more sense: > > > > --author '%s' is neither 'Name ' nor a match for an existing author > > Then > > > --author '%s' is not 'Name ' and matches no existing author > > would be the shortest, sweetest and hopefully grammatical, perhaps? Yes, that one make perfect sense to me. -Peff