From: Scott Schmit <i.grok@comcast.net>
To: git mailing list <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [BUG] Move tracking in git diff is not as good as in git status
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 01:11:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150205061142.GA31599@odin.ulthar.us> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2149 bytes --]
In my use of git, I've noticed that "git status" is a lot better at
tracking moves and renames than "git diff", and this has recently caused
me a lot of headaches because a large number of moves were made in a
single commit, and it was very difficult to figure out which moves were
right and which were wrong.
I was using a fairly old version of git (1.7.11), but was able to
reproduce it on git 2.2.1.
Here's a reproduction recipe:
#!/bin/sh -x
# Fill in your git.git working tree path here:
GIT_GIT_REPO=
if [ -z "$GIT_GIT_REPO" ]; then
echo Fill in GIT_GIT_REPO
exit 1
fi
git init mv-test
cd mv-test/
# Pick two sample files of non-trivial size, since files that are too small
# never get tracked as moves.
cp ${GIT_GIT_REPO}/Documentation/asciidoc.conf .
cp ${GIT_GIT_REPO}/Documentation/blame-options.txt .
git add *
git commit -m "Start with two files from git.git/Documentation"
# Now rename them to something. Using 1 & 2 because they're nice & short.
git mv asciidoc.conf 1
git mv blame-options.txt 2
# Status sees the rename
git status
# So does the summary on the commit
git commit -m "Rename both files"
# And move tracking works
git diff -M --stat --summary HEAD~..
git diff -C --stat --summary HEAD~..
# Now "shift" the files
git mv 2 3
git mv 1 2
# Status knows what's going on
git status
# So does commit
git commit -m "2=1;3=2;"
# Neither of these commands get it (but -C gets a glimmer of the truth)
git diff -M --stat --summary HEAD~..
git diff -C --stat --summary HEAD~..
# Swap the files in place
git mv 3 tmp
git mv 2 3
git mv tmp 2
# Status gets it
git status
# Commit understands
git commit -m "Swap 2 & 3"
# Diff has no idea
git diff -M --stat --summary HEAD~..
git diff -C --stat --summary HEAD~..
---
At first, I thought it was because the "git mv" command recorded
something in the index that's lost once the commit happens.
To check if that was so, I went back to the commit in question, did a
"git reset HEAD~1" and "git add -A ." and git status understood what was
going on just fine.
--
Scott Schmit
[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 3891 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2015-02-05 6:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-05 6:11 Scott Schmit [this message]
2015-02-05 7:39 ` [BUG] Move tracking in git diff is not as good as in git status Kyle J. McKay
2015-02-05 19:01 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150205061142.GA31599@odin.ulthar.us \
--to=i.grok@comcast.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).