From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: Is there some way to suppress Cc email only to stable? Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 15:35:37 -0800 Message-ID: <20150209233537.GG4166@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20150209194224.GA27482@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150209215350.GU29365@google.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, greg@kroah.com To: Jonathan Nieder X-From: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Feb 10 00:35:50 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: glks-stable3@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YKxrj-0001CW-VH for glks-stable3@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 00:35:44 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933301AbbBIXfm (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2015 18:35:42 -0500 Received: from e39.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.160]:56967 "EHLO e39.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932911AbbBIXfl (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2015 18:35:41 -0500 Received: from /spool/local by e39.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 16:35:41 -0700 Received: from d03dlp02.boulder.ibm.com (9.17.202.178) by e39.co.us.ibm.com (192.168.1.139) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 16:35:40 -0700 Received: from b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.15]) by d03dlp02.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D64633E40030; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 16:35:39 -0700 (MST) Received: from d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (d03av05.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.85]) by b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id t19NYEf029294722; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 16:34:14 -0700 Received: from d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id t19NZcXA019555; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 16:35:39 -0700 Received: from paulmck-ThinkPad-W500 (sig-9-65-236-19.ibm.com [9.65.236.19]) by d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id t19NZcXP019525; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 16:35:38 -0700 Received: by paulmck-ThinkPad-W500 (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 943F338BAA2; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 15:35:37 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150209215350.GU29365@google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 15020923-0033-0000-0000-0000039B4032 Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 01:53:50PM -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Hi, > > Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > Cc: > > > > Yet I cannot allow git-send-email to actually send email to that address, > > lest I get an automated nastygram in response. > > Interesting. Last time this came up, the result seemed to be > different[*]. Hmmm... Greg KH didn't say there were no automated nastygrams, just that he wasn't worried about it. I can try it on the next to-be-backported commit and see what happens. Thanx, Paul > Thanks, > Jonathan > > [*] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/178926/focus=178929 >