From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] reflog_expire(): ignore --updateref for symbolic references Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 16:54:21 -0500 Message-ID: <20150212215421.GA19618@peff.net> References: <1423473164-6011-1-git-send-email-mhagger@alum.mit.edu> <1423473164-6011-7-git-send-email-mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Junio C Hamano , Stefan Beller , Ronnie Sahlberg , Jonathan Nieder , =?utf-8?B?Tmd1eeG7hW4gVGjDoWkgTmfhu41j?= Duy , git@vger.kernel.org To: Michael Haggerty X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Feb 12 22:54:32 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YM1iO-0004pm-Up for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:54:29 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752044AbbBLVyZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Feb 2015 16:54:25 -0500 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:48394 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750959AbbBLVyY (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Feb 2015 16:54:24 -0500 Received: (qmail 4747 invoked by uid 102); 12 Feb 2015 21:54:24 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.1) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:54:24 -0600 Received: (qmail 28141 invoked by uid 107); 12 Feb 2015 21:54:27 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 16:54:27 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 12 Feb 2015 16:54:21 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1423473164-6011-7-git-send-email-mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 10:12:42AM +0100, Michael Haggerty wrote: > if (!(flags & EXPIRE_REFLOGS_DRY_RUN)) { > + /* > + * It doesn't make sense to adjust a reference pointed > + * to by a symbolic ref based on expiring entries in > + * the symbolic reference's reflog. > + */ > + int update = (flags & EXPIRE_REFLOGS_UPDATE_REF) && > + ~(type & REF_ISSYMREF); > + Isn't this second clause tautological? Unless REF_ISSYMREF covers all bits in "type", then "type & REF_ISSYMREF" must always have at least one bit 0, and negating it becomes non-zero. Did you mean: !(type & REF_ISSYMREF) ? -Peff