From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Dave Olszewski <cxreg@pobox.com>, Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] cleaner bit-setting in cmd_push
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 01:10:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150216061051.GA29895@peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPc5daU6VOmuNp3VbYgoFDXJshkC2AnRsZQQdoRMArYpezZr=A@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 10:02:08PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 9:54 PM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
> >
> > Or alternatively, we could pull the "flags" field from cmd_push out into
> > a static global "transport_flags", and manipulate it directly from the
> > config (or if we don't like a global, pass it via the config-callback
> > void pointer; but certainly a global is more common in git for code like
> > this). Then we do not have to worry about propagating values from
> > integers into flag bits at all.
>
> Yup, that would be my preference. The largest problem I had with the
> original change was how to ensure that future new code would not
> mistakenly set the global follow_tags _without_ letting the command
> line option parser to override it. If the config parser flips the bit in the
> same flags, it would become much less likely for future code to make
> such a mistake.
So here's my take on it (on top of the two-patch series I just sent).
Dave's patch is 3rd here, just to show its rebased form, but do not take
that as a final endorsement. I still think it could use tests, but I
will let him write them. I am just doing the cleanup in the area, none
of which needs to be his problem. :)
[1/3]: cmd_push: set "atomic" bit directly
[2/3]: cmd_push: pass "flags" pointer to config callback
[3/3]: push: allow --follow-tags to be set by config push.followTags
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-16 6:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-16 3:01 [PATCH] push: allow --follow-tags to be set by config push.followTags Dave Olszewski
2015-02-16 5:20 ` Jeff King
2015-02-16 5:45 ` [PATCH 0/2] clean up push config callbacks Jeff King
2015-02-16 5:46 ` [PATCH 1/2] git_push_config: drop cargo-culted wt_status pointer Jeff King
2015-02-16 5:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] builtin/push.c: make push_default a static variable Jeff King
2015-02-16 5:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-02-17 10:46 ` Jeff King
2015-02-17 17:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-02-17 18:23 ` Jeff King
2015-02-17 22:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-02-18 18:50 ` Jeff King
2015-02-18 19:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-02-18 19:25 ` Jeff King
2015-02-18 19:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-02-18 20:03 ` Jeff King
2015-02-16 5:54 ` [PATCH 3/2] push: allow --follow-tags to be set by config push.followTags Jeff King
2015-02-16 6:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-02-16 6:10 ` Jeff King [this message]
2015-02-16 6:12 ` [PATCH 1/3] cmd_push: set "atomic" bit directly Jeff King
2015-02-16 6:13 ` [PATCH 2/3] cmd_push: pass "flags" pointer to config callback Jeff King
2015-02-16 7:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-02-16 7:16 ` Jeff King
2015-02-16 6:16 ` [PATCH 3/3] push: allow --follow-tags to be set by config push.followTags Jeff King
2015-03-14 6:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-03-14 17:34 ` Jeff King
2015-03-14 17:50 ` Dave Olszewski
2015-03-14 22:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-02-16 6:11 ` [PATCH 3/2] " Junio C Hamano
2015-02-16 6:17 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150216061051.GA29895@peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=cxreg@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).