From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luis Ressel Subject: Re: [GSoC microproject] Add XDG support to the credential-store helper Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 00:41:39 +0100 Message-ID: <20150306004139.2dac2502@gentp.lnet> References: <20150305215146.394caa71@gentp.lnet> <20150306001534.06882282@gentp.lnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/N/iYxWi5DS+fjA4wfFmH=97"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: Christian Couder , Paul Tan To: X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Mar 06 00:41:55 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YTfOp-0004Ng-IY for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 00:41:51 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753485AbbCEXlr (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2015 18:41:47 -0500 Received: from wp260.webpack.hosteurope.de ([80.237.133.29]:47602 "EHLO wp260.webpack.hosteurope.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751197AbbCEXlp (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2015 18:41:45 -0500 Received: from hsi-kbw-046-005-229-078.hsi8.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de ([46.5.229.78] helo=gentp.lnet); authenticated by wp260.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) id 1YTfOh-00053y-KJ; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 00:41:43 +0100 Received: from gentp.lnet (gentp.lnet [IPv6:::1]) by gentp.lnet (Postfix) with ESMTP id D42B1260166; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 00:41:42 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20150306001534.06882282@gentp.lnet> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;aranea@aixah.de;1425598905;1d91a6eb; Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: --Sig_/N/iYxWi5DS+fjA4wfFmH=97 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Okay, I've had a look at Paul's patch for this. Sorry again for the dupe, I must've missed it before. I guess I'll attempt another microproject. However, I feel like my patch is really all that's neccessary; I don't think we should try to use both files if they exist -- I consider Paul's approach to be a bit overcomplicated. My patch still uses ~/.git-credentials as a default location, which should be sufficient for compability. A user that wants to use ~/.config/git/credentials instead has to manually create that file first, which he just shouldn't do if he has to stay compatible to previous git versions. Of course, my patch is definitly lacking a test case, and the documentation could be a tad better, too. Regards, Luis Ressel --Sig_/N/iYxWi5DS+fjA4wfFmH=97 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJU+OmzXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRBMjU3MDBFQTc5QkYzMkY4NEQzMTFGNDlD NzE4OTFBNkEwRUZCN0U5AAoJEMcYkaag77fp5W0P/jJrI3rrTq6Q9jXipoZqDm+z gOeFj4n4rtbhs3wBJA40W8GMfEiPNPntmJgy5RWTwU+/nyOrbZau7jvW7L6R1jv1 4M9ev0fcZJmqG7uT0QQBksVBvlmi+Hdt6bUHg5tSypzAcvpN9S4dmiuF02v0psj1 iXcvAn919vCdgzDIdhl1vjOTiAr+R8zwLErElltvM4Ewiz9osIb1F/dPA5B5lRWC dfJM8r++AiUeX5qCqvqGCwfslsPeYqZEaNi09bhLH5DEnn1rxEU3C4rMDh1c4qfV iusLBtenBCKtv9TqYkhga55j9633JcdoKuxG9ZQDY1ha6gPYu+U2NwlDk1H2qn/B MGtVgcS94BrI4Rar3bJE8hy+pkBrHQofgHq8MB2l7bVAsFmZ4mv41T3pnvzESXzK 9K6YdtsrfggHoqcpwpGWkK2s7jsuuPovx+2xCPtOU5N1TDzCEXdYhqIL42GS1v4I j3xT41KGJ4EpouUAANZbJDoS6fdCL4HJbhsxqcBAl2pdBdUnMHAu8opvDMVKzb0Q 7ZPLh34PHqpZ8fqEttiR5/mrTEhvBmu0u6ylpOsos4jVeqlo1aGtNXPzA9s/WJ0P 8Y/PCxjJAw+mXnA5DeWuWVrXjY7Ysh+LMNGsebQnB2Xui0GQ/4jSWXifnzscDxk5 siQ3koXIFjDbg6tjQWq2 =B173 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/N/iYxWi5DS+fjA4wfFmH=97--