git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Daudt <me@ikke.info>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] rev-list: refuse --first-parent combined with --bisect
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 19:45:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150311184512.GB5442@vps892.directvps.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqoao0xx9p.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 04:12:18PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Kevin Daudt <me@ikke.info> writes:
> 
> > git log --bisect seems to do something different then git rev-list
> > --bisect
> >
> > From git-log(1):
> >
> >     Pretend as if the bad bisection ref refs/bisect/bad was listed and
> >     as if it was followed by --not and the good bisection refs
> >     refs/bisect/good-* on the command line.
> >
> > This seems to just add addition refs to the log command, which seems
> > unrelated to what rev-list --bisect does.
> >
> > So I don't see why git log --bisect --first-parent should be prohibited
> > (unless this combination doesn't make sense on itself).
> 
> Well, but think if your "unless" holds true or not yourself first
> and then say "I do not think this combination doesn't make sense",
> if you truly mean "I don't see why ... should be prohibited".
> 
> What does such a command line _mean_?  It tells us this:
> 
>     Define a set by having the "bad" ref as a positive end, and
>     having all the "good" refs as negative (uninteresting) boundary.
> 
> That is a way to show commits that are reachable from the bad one
> and excluding the ones that are reachable from any of the known-good
> commits.  The area of the graph in the current bisection that
> contains suspect commits.
> 
> Now, what does it mean to pull only the first-parent chain starting
> from the bad one in such a set in the first place?  What does the
> resulting set of commits mean?
> 
> 

In that case it will leave out any merged in branches.

I recalled reading something about this. Searching found me the GSoC
idea:

    When your project is strictly "new features are merged into trunk,
    never the other way around", it is handy to be able to first find a
    merge on the trunk that merged a topic to point fingers at when a
    bug appears, instead of having to drill down to the individual
    commit on the faulty side branch.

So there is definitely a use case for --bisect --first-parent, which
would show you those commits that would be part of the bisection.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-11 18:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-03 14:19 [BUG] Segfault with rev-list --bisect Troy Moure
2015-03-04  5:33 ` Jeff King
2015-03-04 23:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-03-05  2:15   ` Troy Moure
2015-03-07 21:31   ` [PATCH] rev-list: refuse --first-parent combined with --bisect Kevin Daudt
2015-03-07 23:13     ` Kevin Daudt
2015-03-08  8:00       ` Junio C Hamano
2015-03-08 14:18     ` [PATCH v2] " Kevin Daudt
2015-03-08 15:02       ` [PATCH v3] " Kevin Daudt
2015-03-08 15:03       ` Kevin Daudt
2015-03-08 21:58         ` Eric Sunshine
2015-03-09 11:57           ` Kevin Daudt
2015-03-09 20:56         ` [PATCH v4] " Kevin Daudt
2015-03-10 22:09           ` Junio C Hamano
2015-03-10 22:55             ` Kevin Daudt
2015-03-10 23:12               ` Junio C Hamano
2015-03-11 18:45                 ` Kevin Daudt [this message]
2015-03-11 20:13                   ` Junio C Hamano
2015-03-16 16:33                     ` Kevin Daudt
2015-03-16 18:53                       ` Junio C Hamano
2015-03-16 20:25                         ` Philip Oakley
2015-03-16 21:05                           ` Junio C Hamano
2015-03-17 16:09                             ` Christian Couder
2015-03-17 18:33                               ` Junio C Hamano
2015-03-17 19:49                                 ` Christian Couder
2015-03-17 20:46                                   ` Junio C Hamano
2015-03-18 10:36                                     ` Christian Couder
2015-03-19 23:51                                 ` Philip Oakley
2015-03-20 13:02                         ` Scott Schmit
2015-03-19 22:14           ` [PATCH v5] " Kevin Daudt
2015-03-19 22:43             ` Junio C Hamano
2015-03-21 22:01               ` Kevin Daudt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150311184512.GB5442@vps892.directvps.nl \
    --to=me@ikke.info \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).