From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
Cc: "John Keeping" <john@keeping.me.uk>,
"Дилян Палаузов" <dilyan.palauzov@aegee.org>,
"Git Mailing List" <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: git pull & git gc
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 00:34:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150319043437.GA30331@peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACsJy8B3zyf7mCigQSGXOKLcR9s3=VKkxEe4PuSraS6qb-rjcA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:29:57AM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> > That omits the "N objects left over" information. Which I think may be
> > useful, because otherwise the rule is basically "don't do another gc at
> > all for X time units". That's OK for most use, but it has its own corner
> > cases.
>
> True. But saving "N objects left over" in a file also has a corner
> case. If the user "prune --expire=now" manually, the next 'gc --auto'
> still thinks we have that many leftovers and keeps delaying gc for
> some more time. Unless we make 'prune' (or any other commands that
> delete leftovers) to also delete this file. Yeah maybe saving this
> info in a file will work.
I assumed that the user would not run prune manually, but would run "git
gc --prune=now". And yeah, definitely any time gc runs, it should update
the file (if there are fewer than `gc.auto` objects, I think it could
just delete the file).
We could also apply that rule any run of "git prune", but my mental
model is that "git gc" is the magical porcelain that will do this stuff
for you, and "git prune" is the plumbing that users shouldn't need to
call themselves. I don't know if that model is shared by users, though. :)
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-19 4:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-18 13:53 git pull & git gc Дилян Палаузов
2015-03-18 14:16 ` Duy Nguyen
2015-03-18 14:23 ` Дилян Палаузов
2015-03-18 14:33 ` Duy Nguyen
2015-03-18 14:41 ` Duy Nguyen
2015-03-18 14:58 ` John Keeping
2015-03-18 21:04 ` Jeff King
2015-03-19 0:31 ` Duy Nguyen
2015-03-19 1:27 ` Jeff King
2015-03-19 2:01 ` Mike Hommey
2015-03-19 4:14 ` Jeff King
2015-03-19 4:26 ` Mike Hommey
2015-03-19 2:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-03-19 4:09 ` Jeff King
2015-03-19 4:15 ` Duy Nguyen
2015-03-19 4:20 ` Jeff King
2015-03-19 4:29 ` Duy Nguyen
2015-03-19 4:34 ` Jeff King [this message]
2015-03-19 9:47 ` Duy Nguyen
2015-03-18 14:48 ` Дилян Палаузов
2015-03-18 21:07 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150319043437.GA30331@peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=dilyan.palauzov@aegee.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=john@keeping.me.uk \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).