From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick Steinhardt Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/4] submodules: implement synchronizing of remotes. Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 13:57:16 +0200 Message-ID: <20150409115716.GA347@pks-pc> References: <1428490705-11586-1-git-send-email-ps@pks.im> <1428490705-11586-2-git-send-email-ps@pks.im> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE" Cc: Jens Lehmann , Heiko Voigt , Git Mailing List To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Apr 09 13:57:30 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YgB5N-0007Gh-QH for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2015 13:57:30 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933834AbbDIL5Z (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Apr 2015 07:57:25 -0400 Received: from sender1.zohomail.com ([74.201.84.162]:53330 "EHLO sender1.zohomail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933335AbbDIL5Y (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Apr 2015 07:57:24 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=mail; d=pks.im; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; b=kt9Jzf9R0ADI3oeeUg5ocEty5ukjov5LeqSxUMdEos7GT2AFknIBsidtP3ymvlx8Ob9WQ84jbTtJ ftEry9wFZ2XOjsurekkz/5ZCYNwl56es7mtD2Hufzav/JhaldZzUVIVWq7FXvYB7fe1F+SMDsvsn cBbCUmWvA/8vYiU4QeI= Received: from localhost (x5ce10066.dyn.telefonica.de [92.225.0.102]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1428580642356803.6665153011844; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 04:57:22 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Zoho-Virus-Status: 1 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 08:46:28AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 3:58 AM, Patrick Steinhardt wrote: > > Previously it was not possible to specify custom remotes for > > submodules. This feature has now been implemented and can be >=20 > I am not going to say whether it makes sense to add this feature or not, > but I'll just react to "Previously". >=20 > Let's stop saying "Previously we couldn't do X, now we can". >=20 > Instead, let's consistently say "We don't do X. Being able to do X is a > good thing for such and such reasons. Make us capable of doing X by > doing this and that." >=20 > Some people even say "Currently we cannot do X. Teach us to do so", > which is equally bad but that is primarily because some people say > "Previously" and they feel the need to clarify which reality they are > talking about. Once we stop saying "Previously", they will stop saying > "Currently", and the world would be a better place ;-). >=20 > Thanks. Points taken, I'll reword the message if there is any interest in the proposed feature. ;) Patrick --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCAAGBQJVJmkcAAoJEBF8Z7aeq/EsPx0P/1VuGb7NH7De3mO/Ay7TEyEC s3eu0k3FeFWbzvL5Oe4VQerLcE9wGOcVyr6VK7kGfpREz94KRJOGsTkI/AEnLZfd YNLCXc1S/tgYOr0/pRMLHoT7fvQJqUfEMoRE2J7GaJ54tdTFNtEjbH9VrrcMJOWr gdhHiNFUruVcm2nH8IFznZAppdMp/3U41R1GISbBMXEZWU58lmuTaJtGRhnM2ckM NNy4iKVmQgazFpDgxs4bHEwRLX9cd1qG/mD0jHgFfFlaUxsmMc76NYu42+GNlZNk rHt8husJiabZb/yThnJc2hqyUZ1crsXleMGuAIFaQOSJ05v/s6JVNa/TqoO0Zo4g oH7MxFq8v3grbtF6fToxyOA3QRKu5ErACv97Nz/rbI5+RLIouzN21E+6h57yYLyZ ohMd7A8H+9sSHE8dZPG7VqNrX8ggdQYzJ0j6Dkren76S2cWaK6bOywrORd+2EP5z QLMjh0cF7b5aKPTk53cXMunWKIn3XxqnqYu5m2SHiRNt503NA4fD4dgwexG46lae I2g5efnKYbIDWHUASidAgm/VOnO6uiMVUcNXuILT/YqPDfjfsLeMDymMTP77w8Pq WX8PRFcPaOt112z7Kh1Y6IRL4AkeznHBwLAswZLzvSl1bHuLrGdMQXcz5FlSIOo5 KAMhgVza0jwIAAli4J6h =83bl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE--