From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] asciidoc fixups Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 00:29:47 -0400 Message-ID: <20150514042947.GB9351@peff.net> References: <1431451400-1447-1-git-send-email-jn.avila@free.fr> <20150513021556.GA4160@peff.net> <20150513045650.GA6070@peff.net> <20150513053706.GA7783@peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Junio C Hamano , Jean-Noel Avila , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu May 14 06:29:57 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YskmT-0001g1-B5 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 14 May 2015 06:29:57 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750828AbbENE3v (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 May 2015 00:29:51 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:58405 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750713AbbENE3u (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 May 2015 00:29:50 -0400 Received: (qmail 7402 invoked by uid 102); 14 May 2015 04:29:50 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.1) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Wed, 13 May 2015 23:29:50 -0500 Received: (qmail 19674 invoked by uid 107); 14 May 2015 04:29:49 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Thu, 14 May 2015 00:29:49 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 14 May 2015 00:29:47 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 09:43:54AM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > I would like to believe that I am included in said group, because we > recently switched to use AsciiDoctor in Git for Windows 2.x. In > msysGit times, we could not even run AsciiDoc (and neither > AsciiDoctor), instead we relied on Junio publishing the artifacts in > the git-htmldocs repository. Thanks, I didn't know that. I have a vague feeling that AsciiDoctor is the future of AsciiDoc (certainly the AsciiDoctor folks feel that way), so the more we can keep compatibility, the better. Knowing that you guys are actively using it makes me feel even better about spending time on it. > By the way, we have two patches in our fork that are needed here to > use Asciidoctor successfully: > https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/compare/893292c41%5E...893292c41%5E2 > > I would like to put them on top of this patch series. Objections? The first one looks like straight fixes. The second looks rather nasty, and makes the AsciiDoc output worse. I don't have a better solution offhand, though. :( -Peff