From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] asciidoc fixups Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 00:01:24 -0400 Message-ID: <20150515040124.GA15942@peff.net> References: <1431451400-1447-1-git-send-email-jn.avila@free.fr> <20150513021556.GA4160@peff.net> <20150513045650.GA6070@peff.net> <20150513224131.GC425227@vauxhall.crustytoothpaste.net> <20150514042544.GA9351@peff.net> <20150515025223.GB4665@vauxhall.crustytoothpaste.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Junio C Hamano , Jean-Noel Avila , git@vger.kernel.org To: "brian m. carlson" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri May 15 06:01:37 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yt6oa-0001ZF-Gd for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 15 May 2015 06:01:36 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751315AbbEOEB2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 May 2015 00:01:28 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:59019 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750953AbbEOEB1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 May 2015 00:01:27 -0400 Received: (qmail 15322 invoked by uid 102); 15 May 2015 04:01:27 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.1) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Thu, 14 May 2015 23:01:27 -0500 Received: (qmail 30836 invoked by uid 107); 15 May 2015 04:01:26 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Fri, 15 May 2015 00:01:26 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 15 May 2015 00:01:24 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150515025223.GB4665@vauxhall.crustytoothpaste.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 02:52:24AM +0000, brian m. carlson wrote: > Using Asciidoctor 1.5.0, it seems to work properly for me without > subs=normal. So perhaps we should just update the version used for the > site. I realize the Debian version is out of date; I've already filed a > bug. I checked that it was broken on the site, but I didn't check to see how ancient the version there was. And it is rather old. I've opened a PR[1] to bump that. > I opened issue 1344[0] for this. However, it looks like we can write > @+++{++++++}+++ instead of @\{\} and it > will work correctly in both processors. That looks to be a workaround, > as ugly and verbose as it is. Yeah, I guess that works. But man, is it ugly. I'd love it if we can get backslash-escaping in asciidoctor. Thanks for opening the issue. -Peff [1] https://github.com/git/git-scm.com/pull/545