From: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
To: Philippe De Muyter <phdm@macq.eu>
Cc: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: identical hashes on two branches, but holes in git log
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 14:25:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150520132534.GI10518@serenity.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150520131359.GA7043@frolo.macqel>
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 03:13:59PM +0200, Philippe De Muyter wrote:
> My initial problem (still unresolved/unanswered) is that some commits
> that appeared between v3.14-rc1 and v3.14-rc2 (specifically
> 817c27a128e18aed840adc295f988e1656fed7d1) are present in v3.15, but not
> in my branch.
>
> I have just checked online the v3.14 version on
>
> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/log/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
>
> and I see also the same "problem": the commit removing 738 lines is in the log
> 817c27a128e18aed840adc295f988e1656fed7d1
> "ARM: dts: imx6qdl: make pinctrl nodes board specific",
> but the v3.14 version of the file still contains the 738 removed line,
> and I see no commit restoring those lines.
>
> I do not understand why those 738 lines are still present in v3.14 although
> they were removed between v3.14-rc1 and v3.14-rc2 :(
Commit 817c27a128e18aed840adc295f988e1656fed7d1 isn't in v3.14:
$ git describe --contains 817c27a128e18aed840adc295f988e1656fed7d1
v3.15-rc1~77^2~40^2~57
$ git tag --contains 817c27a128e18aed840adc295f988e1656fed7d1
v3.15
v3.15-rc1
v3.15-rc2
v3.15-rc3
v3.15-rc4
v3.15-rc5
v3.15-rc6
v3.15-rc7
v3.15-rc8
v3.15.1
v3.15.10
v3.15.2
[snip later tags]
However, the commit date of 817c27a128e18aed840adc295f988e1656fed7d1 is
between the dates of v3.14-rc1 and v3.14-rc2 so the default commit
ordering of `git log` will show it between those two tags.
`--topo-order` may help but I suspect the history is too complex to
infer the relationship between commits without `--graph`.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-20 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-19 13:29 identical hashes on two branches, but holes in git log Philippe De Muyter
2015-05-19 16:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-05-19 21:47 ` Philippe De Muyter
2015-05-19 22:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-05-21 7:15 ` Philippe De Muyter
2015-05-21 19:58 ` Philip Oakley
2015-05-21 20:37 ` Philippe De Muyter
2015-05-20 7:39 ` Christian Couder
2015-05-19 23:39 ` Jeff King
2015-05-20 13:13 ` Philippe De Muyter
2015-05-20 13:25 ` John Keeping [this message]
2015-05-20 14:12 ` Philippe De Muyter
2015-05-20 16:18 ` Jeff King
2015-05-21 7:05 ` Philippe De Muyter
2015-05-21 16:45 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150520132534.GI10518@serenity.lan \
--to=john@keeping.me.uk \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=phdm@macq.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).