From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] git-verify-pack.txt: fix inconsistent spelling of "packfile" Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 15:49:07 -0400 Message-ID: <20150520194906.GA8421@peff.net> References: <1431845814-2541-1-git-send-email-ps@pks.im> <20150519222427.GA994@peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Patrick Steinhardt To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed May 20 21:49:32 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yv9zc-0000Ai-NE for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 20 May 2015 21:49:29 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754551AbbETTtM (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 May 2015 15:49:12 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:33382 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754162AbbETTtK (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 May 2015 15:49:10 -0400 Received: (qmail 24730 invoked by uid 102); 20 May 2015 19:49:09 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.1) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Wed, 20 May 2015 14:49:09 -0500 Received: (qmail 26270 invoked by uid 107); 20 May 2015 19:49:11 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Wed, 20 May 2015 15:49:11 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 20 May 2015 15:49:07 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:45:09PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > One related thing is that there are few mentions of "idx file" to > refer to "pack index" (e.g. show-index and verify-pack documentation > pages); I think this was an attempt to disambiguate "pack index" > from "the Index", but as long as we spell it "pack index", I think > it should be OK, so while we are at it we may want to fix them. We > can leave "pack .idx file" as-is, but rewriting it to "pack index > file" or just "pack index" may be OK as long as it is clear from the > context. > > "git show-index" has this in SYNOPSIS: > > 'git show-index' < idx-file > > It probably should become > > 'git show-index' < That makes "pack-file" make more sense to me. It is not "the abstract concept of a packfile", but "the file with the .pack extension" (just as "idx-file" is "the file with the .idx extension"). They are the same thing if you think about it, of course, but you might choose one over the other depending on the context. -Peff