From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/14] implement @{push} shorthand Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 00:52:34 -0400 Message-ID: <20150521045233.GA26507@peff.net> References: <20150521044429.GA5857@peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Eric Sunshine , Junio C Hamano To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu May 21 06:52:42 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YvITK-0003r4-D7 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 21 May 2015 06:52:42 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751194AbbEUEwh (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 May 2015 00:52:37 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:33737 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750815AbbEUEwg (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 May 2015 00:52:36 -0400 Received: (qmail 2829 invoked by uid 102); 21 May 2015 04:52:37 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.1) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Wed, 20 May 2015 23:52:36 -0500 Received: (qmail 31465 invoked by uid 107); 21 May 2015 04:52:38 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Thu, 21 May 2015 00:52:38 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 21 May 2015 00:52:34 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150521044429.GA5857@peff.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 12:44:29AM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > This is a re-roll of the series at: > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/268185 > > The only changes here are the addition of patches 2 and 6, which are > both cleanups that help make the other patches more readable/sensible. > They are the same as what was posted during review of the thread linked > above. So there's nothing new here, but of course fresh reviews are > welcome. Actually, that's not quite true; I forgot to mention one change: > [03/14]: remote.c: drop "remote" pointer from "struct branch" In this version, this one remembers to also update the API documentation. -Peff