From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Mike Edgar <adgar@google.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, pclouds@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clone: check if server supports shallow clones
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 15:05:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150610190512.GB22800@peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1433961320-1366-1-git-send-email-adgar@google.com>
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 02:35:20PM -0400, Mike Edgar wrote:
> When the user passes --depth to git-clone the server's capabilities are
> not currently consulted. The client will send shallow requests even if
> the server does not understand them, and the resulting error may be
> unhelpful to the user. This change pre-emptively checks so git-clone can
> exit with a helpful error if necessary.
This sounds like a good thing to do, but...
> --- a/builtin/clone.c
> +++ b/builtin/clone.c
> @@ -944,6 +944,9 @@ int cmd_clone(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>
> refs = transport_get_remote_refs(transport);
>
> + if (option_depth && !is_local && !server_supports("shallow"))
> + die(_("Server does not support shallow clients"));
> +
It feels a little weird to be checking the option here in cmd_clone.
The transport layer knows we have specified a depth, so it seems like a
more natural place for it (or possibly even lower, in the actual
git-protocol code).
That being said, I think the current capabilities handling is a bit
messy and crosses module boundaries freely. So I would not be surprised
if this is the most reasonable place to put it. But it does make me
wonder whether "git fetch --depth=..." needs the same treatment.
I see that do_fetch_pack checks server_supports("shallow"). Is that
enough to cover all fetch cases? And if it is, why does it not cover the
matching clone cases?
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-10 19:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-10 18:35 [PATCH] clone: check if server supports shallow clones Mike Edgar
2015-06-10 19:05 ` Jeff King [this message]
2015-06-10 20:25 ` Michael Edgar
2015-06-10 20:56 ` Jeff King
2015-06-11 13:02 ` Duy Nguyen
2015-06-11 14:32 ` Jeff King
2015-06-11 18:18 ` Michael Edgar
2015-06-11 20:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-06-17 11:48 ` [PATCH v2] fetch-pack: check for shallow if depth given Mike Edgar
2015-06-17 17:00 ` Jeff King
2015-06-17 16:35 ` [PATCH] clone: check if server supports shallow clones Junio C Hamano
2015-06-17 16:59 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150610190512.GB22800@peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=adgar@google.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).