git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Mike Edgar <adgar@google.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, pclouds@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clone: check if server supports shallow clones
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 15:05:14 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150610190512.GB22800@peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1433961320-1366-1-git-send-email-adgar@google.com>

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 02:35:20PM -0400, Mike Edgar wrote:

> When the user passes --depth to git-clone the server's capabilities are
> not currently consulted. The client will send shallow requests even if
> the server does not understand them, and the resulting error may be
> unhelpful to the user. This change pre-emptively checks so git-clone can
> exit with a helpful error if necessary.

This sounds like a good thing to do, but...

> --- a/builtin/clone.c
> +++ b/builtin/clone.c
> @@ -944,6 +944,9 @@ int cmd_clone(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>  
>  	refs = transport_get_remote_refs(transport);
>  
> +	if (option_depth && !is_local && !server_supports("shallow"))
> +		die(_("Server does not support shallow clients"));
> +

It feels a little weird to be checking the option here in cmd_clone.
The transport layer knows we have specified a depth, so it seems like a
more natural place for it (or possibly even lower, in the actual
git-protocol code).

That being said, I think the current capabilities handling is a bit
messy and crosses module boundaries freely. So I would not be surprised
if this is the most reasonable place to put it. But it does make me
wonder whether "git fetch --depth=..." needs the same treatment.

I see that do_fetch_pack checks server_supports("shallow"). Is that
enough to cover all fetch cases? And if it is, why does it not cover the
matching clone cases?

-Peff

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-10 19:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-10 18:35 [PATCH] clone: check if server supports shallow clones Mike Edgar
2015-06-10 19:05 ` Jeff King [this message]
2015-06-10 20:25   ` Michael Edgar
2015-06-10 20:56     ` Jeff King
2015-06-11 13:02   ` Duy Nguyen
2015-06-11 14:32     ` Jeff King
2015-06-11 18:18       ` Michael Edgar
2015-06-11 20:44         ` Junio C Hamano
2015-06-17 11:48           ` [PATCH v2] fetch-pack: check for shallow if depth given Mike Edgar
2015-06-17 17:00             ` Jeff King
2015-06-17 16:35       ` [PATCH] clone: check if server supports shallow clones Junio C Hamano
2015-06-17 16:59         ` Jeff King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150610190512.GB22800@peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=adgar@google.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).