From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] test-lib: turn off "-x" tracing during chain-lint check
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 01:31:47 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150806053146.GA32703@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150806052940.GA32445@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Now that GIT_TEST_CHAIN_LINT is on by default, running:
./t0000-basic.sh -x --verbose-only=1
starts with:
expecting success:
find .git/objects -type f -print >should-be-empty &&
test_line_count = 0 should-be-empty
+ exit 117
error: last command exited with $?=117
+ find .git/objects -type f -print
+ test_line_count = 0 should-be-empty
+ test 3 != 3
+ wc -l
+ test 0 = 0
ok 1 - .git/objects should be empty after git init in an empty repo
This is confusing, as the "exit 117" line and the error line
(which is printed in red, no less!) are not part of the test
at all, but are rather in the separate chain-lint test_eval.
Let's unset the "trace" variable when eval-ing the chain
lint check, which avoids this.
Note that we cannot just do a one-shot variable like:
trace= test_eval ...
as the behavior of one-shot variables for function calls
is not portable.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
---
t/test-lib.sh | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/t/test-lib.sh b/t/test-lib.sh
index cea6cda..374bfcb 100644
--- a/t/test-lib.sh
+++ b/t/test-lib.sh
@@ -571,12 +571,17 @@ test_run_ () {
expecting_failure=$2
if test "${GIT_TEST_CHAIN_LINT:-1}" != 0; then
+ # turn off tracing for this test-eval, as it simply creates
+ # confusing noise in the "-x" output
+ trace_tmp=$trace
+ trace=
# 117 is magic because it is unlikely to match the exit
# code of other programs
test_eval_ "(exit 117) && $1"
if test "$?" != 117; then
error "bug in the test script: broken &&-chain: $1"
fi
+ trace=$trace_tmp
fi
setup_malloc_check
--
2.5.0.148.g63828c1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-06 5:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-05 22:55 What's cooking in git.git Junio C Hamano
2015-08-05 23:14 ` David Turner
2015-08-05 23:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-08-07 16:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-08-06 4:55 ` Jeff King
2015-08-06 5:29 ` [PATCH 0/2] ./t5512-*.sh -x complaints Jeff King
2015-08-06 5:31 ` Jeff King [this message]
2015-08-06 5:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] test-lib: disable trace when test is not verbose Jeff King
2015-08-07 18:47 ` What's cooking in git.git Junio C Hamano
2015-08-06 10:19 ` Johannes Schindelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150806053146.GA32703@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).