From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix `git rev-list --show-notes HEAD` when there are no notes Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 10:43:29 -0400 Message-ID: <20150824144328.GA2151@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <0LZlZ2-1Z1Zyn1mzk-00lZ3Z@mail.gmx.com> <20150823174309.GA24735@sigill.intra.peff.net> <98f2f674e384ac3af38e305165135a60@www.dscho.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Junio C Hamano , Git Mailing List To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Aug 24 16:43:39 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZTsyI-0005PZ-6J for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 16:43:38 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753885AbbHXOnc (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Aug 2015 10:43:32 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:49039 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753772AbbHXOnb (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Aug 2015 10:43:31 -0400 Received: (qmail 20984 invoked by uid 102); 24 Aug 2015 14:43:31 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.1) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 09:43:31 -0500 Received: (qmail 23944 invoked by uid 107); 24 Aug 2015 14:43:31 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 10:43:31 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 24 Aug 2015 10:43:29 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <98f2f674e384ac3af38e305165135a60@www.dscho.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 12:23:52PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > You're right. I think the best approach for now is to error out when > `--show-notes` is passed to rev-list. Do you agree? Yes (I imagine you didn't yet read my follow-up patch when you wrote this). :) -Peff