From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH] t7300: fix broken && chains Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 13:36:51 -0400 Message-ID: <20150901173650.GA5723@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <1440926289-5899-1-git-send-email-erik.elfstrom@gmail.com> <20150831185414.GB20555@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Git List To: erik =?utf-8?B?ZWxmc3Ryw7Zt?= X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Sep 01 19:36:59 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZWpUQ-0007X5-JN for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2015 19:36:58 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754334AbbIARgy convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Sep 2015 13:36:54 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:53140 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752888AbbIARgx (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Sep 2015 13:36:53 -0400 Received: (qmail 6026 invoked by uid 102); 1 Sep 2015 17:36:53 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.1) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Tue, 01 Sep 2015 12:36:53 -0500 Received: (qmail 2888 invoked by uid 107); 1 Sep 2015 17:36:57 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Tue, 01 Sep 2015 13:36:57 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 01 Sep 2015 13:36:51 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 08:27:59AM +0200, erik elfstr=C3=B6m wrote: > ( > echo "100644 $o5 0 a" > echo "100644 $o0 0 c" > echo "160000 $c1 0 d" > ) >expected && >=20 > I'd estimate that there are hundreds of these (see t3030 for > examples). I'm not sure if you care about these? As you say they are > not really very interesting cases. I think patches for these are OK, but no, I don't consider it a high priority if they are harmless (IMHO the real value of the patches is that it removes the noise from the output of your script, so you can find any cases that _do_ matter). -Peff