git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Make "local" orthogonal to date format
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 20:49:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150902194946.GL30659@serenity.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq4mjcq2ac.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>

On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 08:16:59AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> 
> > On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 08:48:26AM +0100, John Keeping wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 06:44:31PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> >> > [1] I do think the error message for "relative-local is nonsense" could
> >> >     perhaps be more explanatory, but I couldn't come up with any better
> >> >     wording. But if you have ideas, feel free to switch it.
> >> 
> >> My only suggestion would be to reuse the "unknown date format: %s"
> >> message and avoid having a special message in this case.
> >
> > Heh, that was what I was trying to avoid. I wanted to avoid "I do not
> > understand our request" and have it more like "I understand what you're
> > _trying_ to do, but it doesn't make sense".
> >
> > I guess "relative dates do not depend on timezones, so -local is
> > meaningless" would be the closest thing.
> >
> > I don't think it is that big a deal whichever way we go, though.
> 
> I somehow thought that the discussion was about raw-local, not
> relative-local, but anyway, I think it would make more sense to
> allow both of them.  If you define the meaning of "-local" as:
> 
>     Pretend that the event in question was recorded with your
>     timezone, and show the timestamp using the specified format sans
>     -local suffix.
> 
> that explains what happens for all the other formats well, and it
> also makes sense for what would happen to raw and even relative, I
> think.

The discussion about "raw-local" was in a separate subthread, I think
we're just bikeshedding the particular error message here.

OTOH, I don't think there's any disagreement about what "relative-local"
and "raw-local" would output were they supported, just whether they are
useful.  There doesn't seem to be any harm in supporting them;
"relative-local" will be identical to "relative" and "raw-local" will
require preparatory code movement for the raw output.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-02 19:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-30 13:54 [RFC/PATCH] date: allow any format to display local time John Keeping
2015-08-31 17:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-08-31 18:50   ` Jeff King
2015-08-31 18:56     ` Jeff King
2015-08-31 19:57     ` Junio C Hamano
2015-08-31 20:00     ` John Keeping
2015-08-31 20:44       ` Jeff King
2015-08-31 20:47         ` [PATCH 1/2] fast-import: switch crash-report date to iso8601 Jeff King
2015-08-31 20:48         ` [PATCH 2/2] date: make "local" orthogonal to date format Jeff King
2015-08-31 21:27           ` John Keeping
2015-08-31 21:33             ` Jeff King
2015-08-31 22:05               ` Jeff King
2015-09-01  8:37                 ` John Keeping
2015-09-01 21:55                   ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Make " John Keeping
2015-09-01 21:55                     ` [PATCH v2 1/6] fast-import: switch crash-report date to iso8601 John Keeping
2015-09-01 21:55                     ` [PATCH v2 2/6] date: make "local" orthogonal to date format John Keeping
2015-09-01 22:16                       ` Junio C Hamano
2015-09-01 22:25                         ` Jeff King
2015-09-01 22:33                         ` John Keeping
2015-09-01 22:39                           ` Jeff King
2015-09-01 22:41                             ` Junio C Hamano
2015-09-02 17:36                       ` Junio C Hamano
2015-09-01 21:55                     ` [PATCH v2 3/6] t6300: introduce test_date() helper John Keeping
2015-09-01 22:19                       ` Junio C Hamano
2015-09-01 22:26                       ` Eric Sunshine
2015-09-01 22:31                       ` Jeff King
2015-09-01 22:40                         ` John Keeping
2015-09-01 22:41                           ` Jeff King
2015-09-01 21:55                     ` [PATCH v2 4/6] t6300: make UTC and local dates different John Keeping
2015-09-01 21:55                     ` [PATCH v2 5/6] t6300: add test for "raw" date format John Keeping
2015-09-01 21:55                     ` [PATCH v2 6/6] t6300: add tests for "-local" date formats John Keeping
2015-09-01 22:44                     ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Make "local" orthogonal to date format Jeff King
2015-09-02  7:48                       ` John Keeping
2015-09-02  8:05                         ` Jeff King
2015-09-02 15:16                           ` Junio C Hamano
2015-09-02 19:49                             ` John Keeping [this message]
2015-09-02 20:11                               ` Junio C Hamano
2015-09-02 20:21                                 ` John Keeping
2015-09-02 20:29                                   ` Junio C Hamano
2015-09-02 21:27                                     ` Jeff King
2015-09-03 21:48                     ` [PATCH v3 00/11] " John Keeping
2015-09-03 21:48                       ` [PATCH v3 01/11] Documentation/blame-options: don't list date formats John Keeping
2015-09-03 21:48                       ` [PATCH v3 02/11] Documentation/config: " John Keeping
2015-09-03 21:48                       ` [PATCH v3 03/11] Documentation/git-for-each-ref: " John Keeping
2015-09-03 21:48                       ` [PATCH v3 04/11] Documentation/rev-list: " John Keeping
2015-09-03 22:36                         ` Junio C Hamano
2015-09-03 21:48                       ` [PATCH v3 05/11] fast-import: switch crash-report date to iso8601 John Keeping
2015-09-03 21:48                       ` [PATCH v3 06/11] t6300: introduce test_date() helper John Keeping
2015-09-03 21:48                       ` [PATCH v3 07/11] t6300: add test for "raw" date format John Keeping
2015-09-03 21:48                       ` [PATCH v3 08/11] date: check for "local" before anything else John Keeping
2015-09-03 22:45                         ` Junio C Hamano
2015-09-03 21:48                       ` [PATCH v3 09/11] date: make "local" orthogonal to date format John Keeping
2015-09-03 21:49                       ` [PATCH v3 10/11] t6300: make UTC and local dates different John Keeping
2015-09-03 21:49                       ` [PATCH v3 11/11] t6300: add tests for "-local" date formats John Keeping
2015-09-08  7:53                       ` [PATCH v3 00/11] Make "local" orthogonal to date format Jeff King
2015-09-02 17:41           ` [PATCH 2/2] date: make " Junio C Hamano
2015-09-02 21:30             ` Jeff King
2015-09-02 22:07               ` John Keeping
2015-09-03 15:54                 ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150902194946.GL30659@serenity.lan \
    --to=john@keeping.me.uk \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).