From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: Git configure/make does not honor ARFLAGS Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 00:59:54 -0400 Message-ID: <20150914045953.GA11039@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20150913101727.GB26562@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20150914043016.GA10167@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Eric Sunshine , Jeffrey Walton , Git List To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Sep 14 07:00:02 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZbLs1-0002sc-HQ for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 07:00:01 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751304AbbINE75 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2015 00:59:57 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:58584 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751276AbbINE74 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2015 00:59:56 -0400 Received: (qmail 22801 invoked by uid 102); 14 Sep 2015 04:59:56 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.1) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 23:59:56 -0500 Received: (qmail 23403 invoked by uid 107); 14 Sep 2015 05:00:04 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 01:00:04 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 14 Sep 2015 00:59:54 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 09:57:08PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 9:30 PM, Jeff King wrote: > > > > Ah, OK. Today I learned something. :) > > > > Jeffrey, can you produce a tested patch which works for you? > > If I am not mistaken, I think I already have one on 'pu' (I think I did that > as an afternoon-tea time hack or something). Oh, indeed. ac179b4d9. Looks good to me. My follow-up question was going to be: is this something we should be setting in config.mak.uname for appropriate versions of Darwin? It wasn't clear to me from Eric's description if this is something that particular versions need, or just something that people who want to build Universal binaries would choose to use. -Peff