From: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] send-email: die if CA path doesn't exist
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 19:46:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151120194651.GC21488@serenity.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151120111848.GC11198@sigill.intra.peff.net>
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 06:18:48AM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 10:12:07PM +0000, John Keeping wrote:
>
> > If the CA path isn't found it's most likely to indicate a
> > misconfiguration, in which case accepting any certificate is unlikely to
> > be the correct thing to do.
>
> Yeah, this seems like a crazy default for security-sensitive code.
>
> I suspect some people will see breakage from applying this (because
> their systems are broken and they did not know it), but that is a good
> thing.
>
> For people who know their systems are broken and want to proceed anyway,
> what is the appropriate work-around? Obviously it involves disabling
> peer verification, but would we want to include instructions for doing
> so (either in the error message, or perhaps mentioning it in the commit
> message)?
The documentation already says:
Set it to an empty string to disable certificate verification.
It's a bit lost in the middle of a paragraph but I think that is the
best place for the detail of how to disable verification.
Having revisted the patch, I do think the message might be a bit terse,
but I can't think of a reasonably concise way to point at the
--smtp-ssl-cert-path argument as being the culprit.
Maybe we shouldn't worry too much about that, but should instead put the
invalid path into the error message:
die "CA path \"$smtp_ssl_cert_path\" does not exist.";
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-20 19:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-17 22:12 [RFC/PATCH] send-email: die if CA path doesn't exist John Keeping
2015-11-20 11:18 ` Jeff King
2015-11-20 19:46 ` John Keeping [this message]
2015-11-24 19:58 ` Jeff King
2015-11-24 22:17 ` John Keeping
2015-11-24 22:28 ` Jeff King
2015-11-24 23:10 ` John Keeping
2015-11-24 23:31 ` [PATCH v2] " John Keeping
2015-11-24 23:35 ` Jeff King
2015-11-25 10:19 ` John Keeping
2015-11-25 10:23 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151120194651.GC21488@serenity.lan \
--to=john@keeping.me.uk \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).