From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: James <rouzier@gmail.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clean: new option --exclude-from
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 11:47:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151202164712.GA16636@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqlh9c6byy.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 08:40:05AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> But for this particular one, I viewed the topic as adding a new
> option as a shorter way for passing multiple -e <pattern> options on
> the command line. When viewed that way, even if core.excludesfile
> were multi-valued, I wouldn't have imagined that people would try to
> use that mechanism for such a purpose--for one thing, the precedence
> order is wrong for that purpose, isn't it?
Good point. I didn't think about precedence at all.
I perhaps shouldn't have brought up core.excludesfile as all. I only
meant it as "you maybe can hack your way through to this without adding
any code".
I think a real option to do git-wide excludes would probably be more
like:
git --exclude-from=/path/to/file clean ...
and that in turn would probably set GIT_EXCLUDE_FROM to a
colon-separated list of paths (or similar) so that sub-processes would
respect it, too.
On the other hand, one could make the same argument about the existing
"-e". You cannot do:
git add --exclude='*.o' .
right now. So maybe "clean" is really the only place where people care
about such ad-hoc exclusion. Or maybe this an opportunity to add:
git --exclude='*.o' clean
I dunno. I cannot think of a time when I would have used any of those
options myself.
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-02 16:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-26 14:44 [PATCH] clean: new option --exclude-from James
2015-11-30 2:24 ` Eric Sunshine
[not found] ` <CAGjXF72PgdjBw03ERVYxj+atvsBXK0LeJ6O3zTZgi3-kv9BWsw@mail.gmail.com>
2015-12-01 22:25 ` Eric Sunshine
2015-12-06 14:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] modernize t7300 James
2015-12-06 14:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] clean: new option --exclude-from James
2015-12-07 20:56 ` Jeff King
2015-12-07 21:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-12-07 22:53 ` Eric Sunshine
2015-12-07 21:40 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] modernize t7300 Junio C Hamano
2015-12-07 22:46 ` Eric Sunshine
2015-12-07 22:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-12-07 22:43 ` Eric Sunshine
2015-12-02 0:53 ` [PATCH] clean: new option --exclude-from Jeff King
2015-12-02 2:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-12-02 2:44 ` Jeff King
2015-12-02 16:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-12-02 16:47 ` Jeff King [this message]
2015-12-02 17:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-12-02 17:51 ` Jeff King
2015-12-06 3:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-12-07 19:39 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151202164712.GA16636@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=rouzier@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).