From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Dec 2015, #01; Tue, 1) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 19:07:05 -0500 Message-ID: <20151203000705.GA22067@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20151202002450.GA27994@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20151202223114.GA20542@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, John Keeping To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Dec 03 01:07:18 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a4HQc-0006EK-B0 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 01:07:18 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757807AbbLCAHK (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Dec 2015 19:07:10 -0500 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:36594 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1757795AbbLCAHI (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Dec 2015 19:07:08 -0500 Received: (qmail 22848 invoked by uid 102); 3 Dec 2015 00:07:08 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.1) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 18:07:08 -0600 Received: (qmail 5396 invoked by uid 107); 3 Dec 2015 00:07:10 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 19:07:10 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 02 Dec 2015 19:07:05 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 03:31:41PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > I just finished my first pass of going through "cook -w" output and > had trouble judging jk/send-email-ssl-errors topic, which is marked > as "waiting for re-roll", but I cannot seem to find any discussion > on it, just the original patch $gmane/281655. Are there concerns? Looks like it needs a slight tweak: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/281693 -Peff