From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Dennis Kaarsemaker <dennis@kaarsemaker.net>
Cc: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: "git stash pop" is doing an unwanted "git add" when there are conflicts.
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 04:30:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151222093032.GA5173@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1450772258.7937.9.camel@kaarsemaker.net>
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 09:17:38AM +0100, Dennis Kaarsemaker wrote:
> On ma, 2015-12-21 at 14:29 +0000, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > Hello, git project.
> >
> > Last night, whilst clearing out a stale "stash stack", I did "git stash
> > pop". There were conflicts in two files.
> >
> > However, all the popped files became staged. This doesn't normally happen.
> > It was intensely irritating, and required me to do "git reset HEAD" on
> > each of the files, none of which I wanted to commit.
> >
> > I searched the git-stash man page for this scenario, but found nothing
> > about it.
> >
> > Surely staging all the files is a bug?
>
> That depends. A stash is two commits: one for all changes that were in
> the index when you ran 'git stash save' and one for all changes not yet
> in the index. When you pop the stash, these then get restored as staged
> resp. unstaged changes. So if your changes are now all staged, I'd
> wager that they were staged when you ran git stash save.
No, I think there's something else going on. Try this:
git init repo &&
cd repo &&
echo base >one &&
echo base >two &&
git add . &&
git commit -m base &&
echo stash >one &&
echo stash >two &&
git stash &&
echo "==> No conflicts, nothing staged"
git stash apply &&
git reset --hard &&
echo changes >two &&
git commit -am changes &&
echo "==> Conflict stages non-conflicting file 'one'"
! git stash apply &&
git status
It seems to be a side effect of merge-recursive to stage the results,
and in the no-conflict path we explicitly reset the index. For the
conflicting case, it's trickier, because we would want to retain the
unmerged entries.
So I agree it's kind of weird, but the conflicting case is inherently
going to touch the index, and you'd generally have to `git add` to mark
the resolutions (but if you really want to just touch the working tree,
you'd need to `git reset`).
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-22 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-21 14:29 "git stash pop" is doing an unwanted "git add" when there are conflicts Alan Mackenzie
2015-12-21 20:34 ` Alan Mackenzie
2015-12-22 8:17 ` Dennis Kaarsemaker
2015-12-22 9:30 ` Jeff King [this message]
2015-12-24 9:20 ` Alan Mackenzie
2015-12-29 7:53 ` Jeff King
2015-12-29 19:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-12-30 7:13 ` Jeff King
2015-12-29 21:20 ` Alan Mackenzie
2015-12-30 7:02 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151222093032.GA5173@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=acm@muc.de \
--cc=dennis@kaarsemaker.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).