From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com>
Cc: bturner@atlassian.com, gitster@pobox.com, pedrorijo91@gmail.com,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] ls-remote: use parse-options api
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 09:44:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160117144409.GA15519@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1453028643-13978-4-git-send-email-t.gummerer@gmail.com>
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 12:04:01PM +0100, Thomas Gummerer wrote:
> Currently ls-remote uses a hand rolled parser for the its command line
> arguments. Use the parse-options api instead of the hand rolled parser
> to simplify the code and make it easier to add new arguments. In
> addition this improves the help message.
Sounds like a good idea.
> + int tags = 0, heads = 0, refs = 0;
> [...]
> + OPT_SET_INT('t', "tags", &tags, N_("limit to tags"), REF_TAGS),
> + OPT_SET_INT('h', "heads", &heads, N_("limit to heads"), REF_HEADS),
> + OPT_SET_INT(0, "refs", &refs, N_("no magic fake tag refs"), REF_NORMAL),
> [...]
> + flags = tags | heads | refs;
Is there any reason these can't be:
OPT_BIT('t', "tags", &flags, N_("limit to tags"), REF_TAGS),
OPT_BIT('h', "heads", &flags, N_("limit to heads"), REF_HEADS),
OPT_BIT(0, "refs", &flags, N_("no magic fake tag refs"), REF_NORMAL),
to make their interaction more obvious? I wondered if there was
anything tricky going on (like some of the bits for each option
overlapping), but I didn't see anything.
> + OPT_SET_INT(0, "refs", &refs, N_("no magic fake tag refs"), REF_NORMAL),
I imagine you took the help string from the comment in check_ref. We can
probably come up with something more descriptive for the user-facing
string. :) How about "do not show peeled tags"?
> + OPT_STRING(0, "upload-pack", &uploadpack, N_("exec"),
> + N_("path of git-upload-pack on the remote host")),
> + OPT_STRING(0, "exec", &uploadpack, N_("exec"),
> + N_("path of git-upload-pack on the remote host")),
Since these are redundant with each other, should we declare one
"hidden" to not appear in "-h" output?
> + OPT_SET_INT(0, "get-url", &get_url,
> + N_("take url.<base>.insteadOf into account"), 1),
Should this one be OPT_BOOL? I think "--no-get-url" works either way (it
resets the variable to 0), but OPT_BOOL communicates the intent more
clearly, I think.
> + OPT_SET_INT(0, "exit-code", &status,
> + N_("exit with exit code 2 if no matching refs are found"), 2),
This one can't be OPT_BOOL, obviously. What happens with
"--no-exit-code"? We'll set it back to "0", which I think is the right
thing to do. Good.
The rest of the patch looked good to me.
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-17 14:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-17 11:03 [PATCH 0/4] ls-remote: introduce symref argument Thomas Gummerer
2016-01-17 11:03 ` [PATCH 1/4] ls-remote: document --quiet option Thomas Gummerer
2016-01-17 14:47 ` Jeff King
2016-01-17 17:13 ` Thomas Gummerer
2016-01-17 11:04 ` [PATCH 2/4] ls-remote: fix synopsis Thomas Gummerer
2016-01-17 11:04 ` [PATCH 3/4] ls-remote: use parse-options api Thomas Gummerer
2016-01-17 14:44 ` Jeff King [this message]
2016-01-17 17:27 ` Thomas Gummerer
2016-01-17 11:04 ` [PATCH 4/4] builtin/ls-remote: add support for showing symrefs Thomas Gummerer
2016-01-17 11:16 ` Thomas Gummerer
2016-01-17 11:04 ` [PATCH 4/4] ls-remote: " Thomas Gummerer
2016-01-17 15:15 ` Jeff King
2016-01-17 17:38 ` Thomas Gummerer
2016-01-17 22:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-01-17 11:14 ` [PATCH 0/4] ls-remote: introduce symref argument Thomas Gummerer
2016-01-17 15:16 ` Jeff King
2016-01-17 17:39 ` Thomas Gummerer
2016-01-17 22:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-01-18 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] ls-remote: introduce symrefs argument Thomas Gummerer
2016-01-18 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] ls-remote: document --quiet option Thomas Gummerer
2016-01-18 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] ls-remote: document --refs option Thomas Gummerer
2016-01-18 19:31 ` Jeff King
2016-01-18 20:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-01-18 21:39 ` Thomas Gummerer
2016-01-18 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] ls-remote: fix synopsis Thomas Gummerer
2016-01-18 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] ls-remote: use parse-options api Thomas Gummerer
2016-01-18 19:33 ` Jeff King
2016-01-18 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] ls-remote: add support for showing symrefs Thomas Gummerer
2016-01-18 19:52 ` Jeff King
2016-01-18 19:53 ` Jeff King
2016-01-18 22:09 ` Thomas Gummerer
2016-01-18 22:09 ` Thomas Gummerer
2016-01-18 22:20 ` Jeff King
2016-01-18 22:35 ` Thomas Gummerer
2016-01-18 20:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-01-18 21:48 ` Thomas Gummerer
2016-01-18 19:53 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] ls-remote: introduce symrefs argument Jeff King
2016-01-18 23:20 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] ls-remote: introduce symref argument Thomas Gummerer
2016-01-18 23:20 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] ls-remote: document --quiet option Thomas Gummerer
2016-01-18 23:20 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] ls-remote: document --refs option Thomas Gummerer
2016-01-18 23:20 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] ls-remote: fix synopsis Thomas Gummerer
2016-01-18 23:20 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] ls-remote: use parse-options api Thomas Gummerer
2016-01-18 23:20 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] ls-remote: add support for showing symrefs Thomas Gummerer
2016-01-19 18:14 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] ls-remote: introduce symref argument Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160117144409.GA15519@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=bturner@atlassian.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=pedrorijo91@gmail.com \
--cc=t.gummerer@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).