git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: larsxschneider@gmail.com, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] travis-ci: run previously failed tests first, then slowest to fastest
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 18:06:33 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160119230633.GA31142@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqio2p89mb.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 02:53:00PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> 
> > This is cute, but isn't it useful even outside Travis's context?  I
> > am not suggesting to touch anything other than .travis.yml file in
> > this patch, but if I wanted to get the benefit from the idea in this
> > patch when I run my tests manually, I can just tell prove to use the
> > cached states, no?
> 
> It seems that exporting something like
> 
>     GIT_PROVE_OPTS="--timer --state=slow,save -j8" 
> 
> when running "make DEFAULT_TEST_TARGET=prove test" does give me the
> same benefit by leaving the stats from the previous run in t/.prove
> when making the test scheduling decisions.

Yes, I've been using this on my local machine for years (which is why I
suggested it to Lars for the Travis build). I have also noticed that my
test runs take about as much time as the longest-running test, and do
not fully utilize all of my processors. I suspect we could drop the
run-time of the test suite substantially by splitting a few of the
longer tests.

You also wrote earlier:

> IOW, I am confused by the beginning of the log message that says
> this is taking advantage of "the Travis-CI cache feature".  This
> improvement looks to me like using the feature of "prove" that
> allows us to run slower tests first, and does not have much to do
> with Travis.

The interesting Travis feature we are using is that we are allowed to
store some data from run-to-run. So we use the Travis feature that lets
us use the prove feature. :)

> One thing I noticed but didn't dig further to fix was that this
> "prove --state" business did not seem to work well together with
> 
>     make T="...list of tests..." test
> 
> that limits the set of tests to perform.

Right, it does not do what you want.  The "prove --state" feature is not
just about ordering, but also about selecting. When run via "make", we
always give prove the full list of tests. But you can also do:

  prove --state=failed

manually to just run whatever failed on the last run.

I don't know if there is a way to tell prove "use the state for
ordering, but don't otherwise select from it", which would do what you
want above.

You can also note that if we ever delete a test script, it will still be
mentioned in prove's state file. I think prove is smart enough to
realize it went away and not bother you.

-Peff

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-19 23:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-19  9:24 [PATCH] travis-ci: run previously failed tests first, then slowest to fastest larsxschneider
2016-01-19 19:12 ` Jeff King
2016-01-19 23:00   ` Junio C Hamano
2016-01-20  0:26     ` Mike Hommey
2016-01-20  1:46       ` Junio C Hamano
2016-01-20  1:56         ` Jeff King
2016-01-20  9:22         ` Lars Schneider
2016-01-22  2:33           ` brian m. carlson
2016-01-22  5:52             ` Jeff King
2016-01-22  6:07               ` Jeff King
2016-01-24 14:34                 ` Thomas Gummerer
2016-01-24 20:03                   ` Junio C Hamano
2016-01-24 22:05                     ` Junio C Hamano
2016-01-25 14:42                       ` Thomas Gummerer
2016-01-25 17:26                         ` Junio C Hamano
2016-01-25 21:52                           ` Junio C Hamano
2016-01-27 15:16                             ` Clemens Buchacher
2016-01-27 19:05                               ` Junio C Hamano
2016-01-27 20:49                                 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-01-28  7:10                                   ` Clemens Buchacher
2016-01-28 21:32                                     ` Junio C Hamano
2016-01-30  8:13                                       ` Clemens Buchacher
2016-02-01 18:17                                         ` Junio C Hamano
2016-02-01 19:33                                           ` Clemens Buchacher
2016-02-02 23:14                                             ` Junio C Hamano
2016-02-03  8:31                                               ` Junio C Hamano
2016-02-01 20:26                                           ` Torsten Bögershausen
2016-01-28  6:20                                 ` eol round trip Was: [PATCH] travis-ci: run previously failed Torsten Bögershausen
2016-01-25 22:41                           ` [PATCH] travis-ci: run previously failed tests first, then slowest to fastest Thomas Gummerer
2016-01-20  1:53       ` Jeff King
2016-01-20  9:10       ` Lars Schneider
2016-01-19 20:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-01-19 22:53   ` Junio C Hamano
2016-01-19 23:06     ` Jeff King [this message]
2016-01-19 23:26       ` Junio C Hamano
2016-01-19 23:29         ` Jeff King
2016-01-19 23:30         ` Junio C Hamano
2016-01-19 23:27       ` Jeff King
2016-01-20  7:55   ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-01-20  9:04   ` Lars Schneider
2016-01-20 20:35     ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160119230633.GA31142@sigill.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=larsxschneider@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).