From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] give "nbuf" strbuf a more meaningful name
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 06:59:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160131115947.GA5438@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1601311245170.2964@virtualbox>
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 12:54:29PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi Peff,
>
> On Sun, 31 Jan 2016, Jeff King wrote:
>
> > > It's a shame that we can't just factor out this common
> > > code, but I don't think it's quite long enough to merit
> > > the boilerplate. The interesting part of each function
> > > happens inside the loop. If C had lambdas, we could do
> > > something like:
> > >
> > > foreach_path_from(stdin, nul_term_line) {
> > > /* now do something interesting with "buf"
> > > and some other local variables */
> > > }
>
> Technically, we do not have to do lambdas for that paradigm, we could
> introduce a new data type and a reader, i.e. something like this:
> [...]
> And then the repeated code could be replaced by something like this:
>
> struct path_reader path_reader = PATH_READER_INIT;
>
> while (read_next_path(&reader, stdin, 1)) {
> ... [work with reader->path.buf] ...
> }
>
> cleanup_path_reader();
Yeah, you're right. I was thinking of lifting the loop completely out of
the call-sites, but simplifying it to a single line loop condition is
just as good.
I still think this crosses my line of "too much boilerplate to be worth
it", though.
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-31 12:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-31 11:22 [PATCH 0/6] post-strbuf_getline cleanups Jeff King
2016-01-31 11:25 ` [PATCH 1/6] give "nbuf" strbuf a more meaningful name Jeff King
2016-01-31 11:54 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-01-31 11:59 ` Jeff King [this message]
2016-01-31 12:01 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-01-31 11:25 ` [PATCH 2/6] checkout-index: simplify "-z" option parsing Jeff King
2016-01-31 11:26 ` [PATCH 3/6] checkout-index: handle "--no-prefix" option Jeff King
2016-01-31 11:29 ` [PATCH 4/6] checkout-index: handle "--no-index" option Jeff King
2016-02-01 2:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-02-01 3:22 ` Jeff King
2016-01-31 11:30 ` [PATCH 5/6] checkout-index: disallow "--no-stage" option Jeff King
2016-02-01 2:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-02-01 3:18 ` Jeff King
2016-01-31 11:35 ` [PATCH 6/6] apply, ls-files: simplify "-z" parsing Jeff King
2016-01-31 11:59 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-02-01 21:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-02-01 22:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-02-02 5:29 ` Jeff King
2016-02-01 2:14 ` [PATCH 0/6] post-strbuf_getline cleanups Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160131115947.GA5438@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).