git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: "SZEDER Gábor" <szeder@ira.uka.de>
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
	Sebastian Schuberth <sschuberth@gmail.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	tr@thomasrast.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-completion.bash: always swallow error output of for-each-ref
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 18:40:42 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160212234041.GA15688@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160213002122.Horde.mxoPmZIuCikpV2PO97l11AI@webmail.informatik.kit.edu>

On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 12:21:22AM +0100, SZEDER Gábor wrote:

> I think in this case we should opt for performance instead of correctness,
> and use Peff's 'refname:strip=2'.  Ambiguous refs will only hurt you, if,
> well, your repo actually has ambiguous refs AND you happen to want to do
> something with one of those refs.  I suspect that's rather uncommon, and
> even then you could simply rename one of those refs.  OTOH, as shown in
> the ticket, you don't need that many refs to make refs completion
> unacceptably slow on Windows, and it will bite every time you attempt to
> complete a ref.

I'm not even sure that this is a correctness tradeoff at all. For
example, in the function __git_heads(), we are asking for-each-ref to
tell us about everything under refs/heads/. If you have a refs/heads/foo
and refs/tags/foo, we don't care; we are trying to print the unqualified
branch names. And in fact having refname:short print "heads/foo" in this
case may be actively wrong. For instance, in _git_branch(), you cannot
use the resulting completion of "heads/foo", as that command wants
unqualified names in "refs/heads/", and you do not have
"refs/heads/heads/foo".

So I think switching to :strip is an improvement in both correctness
_and_ performance.

> Now, if 'git for-each-ref' could understand '**' globbing, not just
> fnmatch...

I think it does already, since 4917e1e (Makefile: promote wildmatch to
be the default fnmatch implementation, 2013-05-30).

-Peff

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-12 23:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-04 10:34 [PATCH] git-completion.bash: always swallow error output of for-each-ref Sebastian Schuberth
2016-02-04 11:13 ` Jeff King
2016-02-04 11:26   ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-02-04 11:45     ` Jeff King
2016-02-04 19:06     ` Junio C Hamano
2016-02-12 23:21     ` SZEDER Gábor
2016-02-12 23:40       ` Jeff King [this message]
2016-02-13  1:07         ` SZEDER Gábor
2016-02-13  9:21           ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-02-13 13:53             ` SZEDER Gábor
2016-02-13 17:14               ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-02-13 16:57           ` Jeff King
2016-02-12 23:43       ` SZEDER Gábor
2016-02-12 23:46         ` Jeff King
2016-02-13  0:53           ` Duy Nguyen
2016-02-12 20:00   ` Junio C Hamano
2016-02-12 20:10     ` Jeff King
2016-02-12 20:26       ` Junio C Hamano
2016-02-12 21:40     ` SZEDER Gábor
2016-02-12 22:16       ` Jeff King
2016-02-12 23:37         ` Junio C Hamano
2016-02-23 23:30           ` Junio C Hamano
2016-02-24  7:48             ` Sebastian Schuberth
2016-02-12  9:23 ` Sebastian Schuberth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160212234041.GA15688@sigill.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=sschuberth@gmail.com \
    --cc=szeder@ira.uka.de \
    --cc=tr@thomasrast.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).