From: Santiago Torres <santiago@nyu.edu>
To: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Cc: Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] builtin/verify-tag: move verification code to tag.c
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 17:53:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160403215310.GC28933@LykOS> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPig+cS47LSmwtLWPJZG8eFByEJ+t_hegM93nqsfTZEoH-+f4Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 04:19:26AM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 7:16 PM, <santiago@nyu.edu> wrote:
> > The PGP verification routine for tags could be accessed by other
> > commands that require it. We do this by moving it to the common tag.c
> > code. We rename the verify_tag() function to pgp_verify_tag() to avoid
> > conflicts with the mktag.c function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Santiago Torres <santiago@nyu.edu>
> > ---
> > - len = parse_signature(buf, size);
> > -
> > - if (size == len) {
> > - if (flags & GPG_VERIFY_VERBOSE)
> > - write_in_full(1, buf, len);
> > - return error("no signature found");
> > - }
> > [...]
> > + payload_size = parse_signature(buf, size);
> > +
> > + if (size == payload_size) {
> > + write_in_full(1, buf, payload_size);
> > + return error("No PGP signature found in this tag!");
> > + }
>
> Also, [1] asked why the moved code no longer respects
> GPG_VERIFY_VERBOSE, and that question doesn't seem to be answered
> either in the previous review thread or by this patch's commit
> message. It's not clear at a casual glance why this change is
> desirable.
>
I must've missed this when moving code around. I don't think that this
if should change in any way. I'll put it back as it is (other than the
variable naming that is)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-03 21:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-02 23:16 [PATCH v3 0/4] tag: move PGP verification code to tag.c santiago
2016-04-02 23:16 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] builtin/verify-tag.c: Ignore SIGPIPE on gpg-interface santiago
2016-04-03 4:30 ` Jeff King
2016-04-03 6:50 ` Johannes Sixt
2016-04-03 21:46 ` Santiago Torres
2016-04-02 23:16 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] t/t7030-verify-tag.sh: Adds validation for multiple tags santiago
2016-04-03 4:40 ` Jeff King
2016-04-03 7:59 ` Eric Sunshine
2016-04-03 13:07 ` Jeff King
2016-04-03 21:58 ` Santiago Torres
2016-04-04 1:38 ` Eric Sunshine
2016-04-04 13:41 ` Jeff King
2016-04-02 23:16 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] builtin/verify-tag: move verification code to tag.c santiago
2016-04-03 4:45 ` Jeff King
2016-04-03 8:11 ` Eric Sunshine
2016-04-03 8:19 ` Eric Sunshine
2016-04-03 21:53 ` Santiago Torres [this message]
2016-04-02 23:16 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] tag: use pgp_verify_function in tag -v call santiago
2016-04-03 4:56 ` Jeff King
2016-04-03 21:43 ` Santiago Torres
2016-04-04 4:12 ` Santiago Torres
2016-04-04 13:38 ` Jeff King
2016-04-04 18:24 ` Santiago Torres
2016-04-04 20:19 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160403215310.GC28933@LykOS \
--to=santiago@nyu.edu \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).