git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Santiago Torres <santiago@nyu.edu>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
	Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] builtin/verify-tag: replace name argument with sha1
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 23:38:45 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160407033844.GB17848@LykOS> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqa8l6zoqc.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>

> >  	type = sha1_object_info(sha1, NULL);
> >  	if (type != OBJ_TAG)
> >  		return error("%s: cannot verify a non-tag object of type %s.",
> > -				name, typename(type));
> > +				hex_sha1, typename(type));
> 
> So, if I said
> 
>     $ git verify-tag master
> 
> the code used to take "master" from argv[], fed it to verify_tag()
> as parameter 'name', turned it to the object name of the commit,
> noticed that it is not a tag, and complained that "master: cannot verify".
> 
> With this rewrite, the same invocation would cause "master" to be
> turned into the object name, which is passed to verify_tag() and the
> complaint is an overlong
> 
>     76bece327f490cb344b95ae8f869cbeb89a4d20b: cannot verify a non-tag object of type commit
> 
> That does not sound like a good change at all.

Yep, I agree. At least I believe that we can do better in terms of user
feedback.

> 
> If you want to support a future caller of a libified version of
> verify_tag() that has a raw object name but not the original name,
> I'd suggest to make this function keep parameter 'name' while adding
> the new parameter 'sha1'.  Then, the error reporting may become:
> 
> 	return error("%s: cannot verify a non-tag object of type '%s'",
> 		     name ? name : sha1_to_hex(sha1), typename(type));
> 

Yep, I'll do some experimenting with this.

> and the output would still be useful.  Further improvements may be
> 
>  - rename 'name' to 'report_name' to clarify that the parameter is
>    only used for reporting, and that the tag object to verify is
>    always identified by the new 'sha1' parameter.

This seems to be fundamental. As it was suggested before, making it
clear that name is only for feedback purposes is really necessary. 

> 
>  - use find_unique_abbrev() to shorten the fallback name displayed in
>  the error message.

I think we can do both. Let me try this out. 

Would you suggest having these changes in a separate patch?


Thanks!
-Santiago.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-07  3:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-05 16:07 [PATCH v5 0/6] tag: move PGP verification code to tag.c santiago
2016-04-05 16:07 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] builtin/verify-tag.c: Ignore SIGPIPE on gpg-interface santiago
2016-04-06 16:43   ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-05 16:07 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] t7030-verify-tag: Adds validation for multiple tags santiago
2016-04-06  6:21   ` Eric Sunshine
2016-04-17 17:31     ` Santiago Torres
2016-04-17 18:19       ` Eric Sunshine
2016-04-17 18:38         ` Santiago Torres
2016-04-17 18:53           ` Eric Sunshine
2016-04-06 16:45   ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-05 16:07 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] builtin/verify-tag: change variable name for readability santiago
2016-04-06 16:46   ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-05 16:07 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] builtin/verify-tag: replace name argument with sha1 santiago
2016-04-06  6:56   ` Eric Sunshine
2016-04-06 16:27   ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-07  3:38     ` Santiago Torres [this message]
2016-04-05 16:07 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] builtin/verify-tag: move verification code to tag.c santiago
2016-04-06 16:33   ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-05 16:07 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] tag: use gpg_verify_function in tag -v call santiago
2016-04-06  7:09   ` Eric Sunshine
2016-04-05 16:44 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] tag: move PGP verification code to tag.c Santiago Torres
2016-04-06  7:18 ` Eric Sunshine
2016-04-07  3:40   ` Santiago Torres
2016-04-07 16:19     ` Eric Sunshine
2016-04-17 17:34       ` Santiago Torres
2016-04-17 18:14         ` Eric Sunshine
2016-04-06 16:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-07  3:33   ` Santiago Torres

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160407033844.GB17848@LykOS \
    --to=santiago@nyu.edu \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).