From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Apr 2016, #06; Thu, 21) Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 14:38:45 -0400 Message-ID: <20160422183844.GB7595@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20160422044258.GA31619@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Apr 22 20:39:15 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1atfyx-0004L3-6s for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 20:39:11 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752134AbcDVSit (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Apr 2016 14:38:49 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:54319 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752074AbcDVSis (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Apr 2016 14:38:48 -0400 Received: (qmail 18332 invoked by uid 102); 22 Apr 2016 18:38:47 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 14:38:47 -0400 Received: (qmail 8976 invoked by uid 107); 22 Apr 2016 18:38:47 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 14:38:47 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 22 Apr 2016 14:38:45 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 10:22:42AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> * jk/push-client-deadlock-fix (2016-04-20) 5 commits > [...] > Thanks. Something like this, perhaps? > > "git push" from a corrupt repository that attempts to push a large > number of refs deadlocked; the thread to relay rejection notices > for these ref updates blocked on writing them to the main thread, > after the main thread at the receiving end notices that the push > failed and decides not to read these notices and return a failure. Yep, that's perfect. > >> * da/user-useconfigonly (2016-04-01) 2 commits > [...] > What often happens is that I start waiting, and then when > necessary actions to move things forward is never taken, and there > are many other topics that need my attention to move forward, I stop > caring, especially when the topic is not something other people care > about (if the original author does not care deeply enough, why > should we?). > > Let me read it over again as it has been a while and then move it > forward with your Reviewed-by's. It is a minor bugfix, but I think worth doing. Adding reviewed-by me is definitely fine. -Peff