git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "SZEDER Gábor" <szeder@ira.uka.de>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com>,
	Ben Woosley <Ben.Woosley@gmail.com>,
	Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>, Git Users <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update git-p4 to be compatible with git-lfs 1.2
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 01:10:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160426011056.Horde.yl47nWMpVGsuGDgrKiKb_nR@webmail.informatik.kit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq8u01mwji.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>


Quoting Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>:

> SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de> writes:
>
>> You can have a look at these patches at
>>
>>   https://github.com/szeder/git completion-test-multiple-bash-versions
>>
>> and perhaps you could even adapt it to LFS and/or p4 somehow.
>>
>>> Plus if we want to be consistent we would
>>> need to do the same for LFS 1.0, 1.2, and for pretty much every other
>>> dependency...
>>
>> I'm not sure we should be consistent in this case, at least not solely
>> for consistency's sake and not in git.git. Taking what I did for Bash
>> and doing it for different versions of LFS, p4, etc. could perhaps
>> keep the runtime under control, but t/Makefile would surely get out
>> of control rather quickly.  Putting these into a travis-ci matrix is
>> so much simpler, but the runtime makes it infeasible, of course.
>
> I took a brief look of your branch, and I like its approach.  If I
> understood your approach correctly, you:
>
>  * Group selected tests in t/ as "these are bash related tests I
>    care about" in t/Makefile;

Yes.

>  * Add Travis test target to build Git with specific versions of
>    bash, and run the above target instead of the full test to
>    exercise the version of bash you are testing.

Not quite.

   * Add t/Makefile targets to run a Bash-related test script with a
     specific Bash version, one target for each script-version pair,
     and a target to run all Bash-related tests with all listed
     Bash-versions.

   * Extend the travis-ci config so that, after building Git as usual
     and running the full test suite as usual, it additionaly runs all
     Bash-related tests will all listed Bash versions on Linux builds.

> And I agree that the same can be done for LFS versions and P4
> versions.  Only a handful tests in t/ are about these niches.

Luckily for me, running a test script with a specific Bash version is
as trivial as '/path/to/bash-vX.Y t9902-completion.sh'.  No
modifications to the test scripts or to lib-bash.sh were necessary.

OTOH, Git LFS and p4 tests, AFAICS, rely on git-lfs and p4 binaries
being available in $PATH, and the p4 tests need two binaries.  So
there is more work that has to be done, as we would need a way to
override those binaries found in $PATH, either through an environment
variable or a command line option.  Bonus points for a solution that
would work equally well with LFS, p4 and Bash: then perhaps we could
have a single unified block of Makefile metaprogramming, which could
generate  all those test targets from a list of dependency-specific
tests and a list of paths to different versions of that dependency.
Then it might even be suitable for inclusion in git.git.


>> I think the best we can do is to keep this out of git.git and let
>> (hope?) developers interested in a particular subsystem do this
>> "multiple version compatibility" tests as they see fit.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-25 23:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-20 18:28 [PATCH] Update git-p4 to be compatible with git-lfs 1.2 Ben Woosley
2016-04-20 19:00 ` Luke Diamand
2016-04-20 19:13   ` Ben Woosley
2016-04-20 19:36     ` Lars Schneider
2016-04-20 21:10       ` Ben Woosley
2016-04-22  8:10         ` Lars Schneider
2016-04-25 16:25           ` SZEDER Gábor
2016-04-25 17:24             ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-25 23:10               ` SZEDER Gábor [this message]
2016-04-28  6:09                 ` Lars Schneider

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160426011056.Horde.yl47nWMpVGsuGDgrKiKb_nR@webmail.informatik.kit.edu \
    --to=szeder@ira.uka.de \
    --cc=Ben.Woosley@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=larsxschneider@gmail.com \
    --cc=luke@diamand.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).