From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/29] refs: don't dereference on rename Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 10:08:17 -0400 Message-ID: <20160429140817.GA26643@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <27f8b223e42dcf1cf3c010833e0aff7baa4559c2.1461768690.git.mhagger@alum.mit.edu> <57230F71.2020401@alum.mit.edu> <57233E19.4000200@alum.mit.edu> <20160429121228.GA27952@sigill.intra.peff.net> <572367B4.4050207@alum.mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Junio C Hamano , David Turner , git@vger.kernel.org, =?utf-8?B?Tmd1eeG7hW4gVGjDoWkgTmfhu41j?= Duy , Ramsay Jones To: Michael Haggerty X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Apr 29 16:08:37 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aw95v-0004bH-7U for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 16:08:35 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753534AbcD2OIX (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Apr 2016 10:08:23 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:59098 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753127AbcD2OIV (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Apr 2016 10:08:21 -0400 Received: (qmail 8080 invoked by uid 102); 29 Apr 2016 14:08:20 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 10:08:20 -0400 Received: (qmail 22007 invoked by uid 107); 29 Apr 2016 14:08:22 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 10:08:22 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 29 Apr 2016 10:08:17 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <572367B4.4050207@alum.mit.edu> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 03:55:00PM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote: > It's beyond the ambition of this patch to fix this old rename_ref() > code, but... > [...] Thanks for the explanation. That all makes sense to me, and I can definitely live with "historical warts that aren't worth touching in this series" as the verdict. -Peff